Literature DB >> 17694888

Perceptions of young people about decision making in the acute healthcare environment.

Janet Kelsey1, Nadine Abelson-Mitchell, Heather Skirton.   

Abstract

AIM: This study explored young people's perceptions of their involvement in healthcare decisions affecting their management of care.
METHOD: A phenomenological approach was used to allow in-depth examination of the young people's personal accounts of their experiences. Data were obtained from 10 hospitalised young people between the ages of 12-16 years from both genders and from different medical and surgical specialities using focused interviews. Transcribing, reading and listening to the data enabled data analysis through reflection and analysis.
FINDINGS: Three themes were identified: level of involvement in decision-making; psychological impact of involvement in decision making; and communication.
CONCLUSION: Professional practice in the care of young people should include effective communication, a policy of inclusion and active assessment of competence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17694888     DOI: 10.7748/paed.19.6.14.s25

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paediatr Nurs        ISSN: 0962-9513


  9 in total

1.  Developing a framework to support shared decision making for youth mental health medication treatment.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Crickard; Megan S O'Brien; Charles A Rapp; Cheryl L Holmes
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2010-06-23

2.  Attitudes and experience of youth and their parents with psychiatric medication and relationship to self-reported adherence.

Authors:  Megan O'Brien; Elizabeth Crickard; Jaehoon Lee; Cheryl Holmes
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2012-07-21

3.  Shared Decision-Making in Youth Mental Health Care: Using the Evidence to Plan Treatments Collaboratively.

Authors:  David A Langer; Amanda Jensen-Doss
Journal:  J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol       Date:  2016-12-02

4.  Participation of Children in Medical Decision-Making: Challenges and Potential Solutions.

Authors:  Vida Jeremic; Karine Sénécal; Pascal Borry; Davit Chokoshvili; Danya F Vears
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 1.352

5.  Developing a new justification for assent.

Authors:  Amanda Sibley; Andrew J Pollard; Raymond Fitzpatrick; Mark Sheehan
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 2.652

6.  A Mobile Phone App to Support Young People in Making Shared Decisions in Therapy (Power Up): Study Protocol.

Authors:  Louise Chapman; Julian Edbrooke-Childs; Kate Martin; Helen Webber; Michael P Craven; Chris Hollis; Jessica Deighton; Roslyn Law; Peter Fonagy; Miranda Wolpert
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2017-10-30

7.  Barriers and facilitators of pediatric shared decision-making: a systematic review.

Authors:  Laura Boland; Ian D Graham; France Légaré; Krystina Lewis; Janet Jull; Allyson Shephard; Margaret L Lawson; Alexandra Davis; Audrey Yameogo; Dawn Stacey
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 8.  Factors That Foster Therapeutic Alliance in Pediatric Sports and Orthopedics: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Rachel N Meyers; Robyn B McHugh; Alissa M Conde
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 9.  People's Experience of Shared Decision Making in Musculoskeletal Physiotherapy: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis.

Authors:  Jessica Grenfell; Andrew Soundy
Journal:  Behav Sci (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-12
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.