Literature DB >> 17692978

Intraoperative real-time planned conformal prostate brachytherapy: post-implantation dosimetric outcome and clinical implications.

Michael J Zelefsky1, Yoshiya Yamada, Gil'ad N Cohen, Neha Sharma, Alison M Shippy, David Fridman, Marco Zaider.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report the dosimetric outcome of patients with clinically localized prostate cancer treated with I-125 permanent implantation using an intraoperative real-time conformal planning technique. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Five hundred and sixty-two patients with prostate cancer were treated with I-125 permanent interstitial implantation using a transrectal ultrasound-guided approach. Real-time intraoperative treatment planning software that incorporates inverse planning optimization was used. Dose-volume constraints for this inverse-planning system included: prostate V100 >or=95%, maximal urethral dose <or=120%, and average rectal dose <80% of the prescription dose. Day zero computed tomography scans were acquired for post-implantation dosimetric evaluation.
RESULTS: The median V100 and D90 to the prostate target were 96% and 166 Gy, respectively. In 91% of cases a D90 of >or=140 Gy was achieved. In these patients, the V100 and D90 values did not have a significant influence on PSA relapse-free survival outcomes. The median maximum rectal dose and urethral doses were 104 Gy (72% of the prescription dose) and 187 Gy (130% of the prescription dose). The average and maximum rectal doses exceeding 100% of the prescription dose were less than 1% and 10% of patients, respectively. Average and maximum urethral doses exceeding 150% of the prescription dose were noted in 3% and 24% of patients, respectively. Average and maximum urethral doses exceeded 120% of the prescription dose in 21% and 58% of patients, respectively. Among patients where >or=2.5 cm(3) of the rectum was exposed to the prescription dose, the incidence of late grade 2 toxicity rectal toxicity was 9% compared to 4% for smaller volumes of the rectum exposed to similar doses (p=0.003). No dosimetric parameter in these patients with tight dose confines for the urethra influenced acute or late urinary toxicity.
CONCLUSION: Real-time intraoperative planning was associated with a 90% consistency of achieving the planned intraoperative dose constraints for target coverage and maintaining planned urethral and rectal constraints in a high percentage of implants. Rectal volumes of >or=2.5 cm(3) exposed to the prescription doses were associated with an increased incidence of grade 2 rectal bleeding. Further enhancements in imaging guidance for optimal seed deposition are needed to guarantee optimal dose distribution for all patients. Whether such improvements lead to further reduction in acute and late morbidities associated with therapy requires further study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17692978     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2007.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  13 in total

1.  Institutional patient accrual volume and the treatment quality of I‑125 prostate seed implantation in a Japanese nationwide prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Katsumasa Nakamura; Saiji Ohga; Atsunori Yorozu; Shiro Saito; Takashi Kikuchi; Takushi Dokiya; Masanori Fukushima; Hidetoshi Yamanaka
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Results from the Quality Research in Radiation Oncology (QRRO) survey: Evaluation of dosimetric outcomes for low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.

Authors:  Michael J Zelefsky; Gil'ad N Cohen; Walter R Bosch; Lisa Morikawa; Najma Khalid; Cheryl L Crozier; W Robert Lee; Anthony Zietman; Jean Owen; J Frank Wilson; Phillip M Devlin
Journal:  Brachytherapy       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  Real-time intraoperative computed tomography assessment of quality of permanent interstitial seed implantation for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Michael J Zelefsky; Mick Worman; Gilad N Cohen; Xin Pei; Marisa Kollmeier; Josh Yamada; Brett Cox; Zhigang Zhang; Eva Bieniek; Lawrence Dauer; Marco Zaider
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 4.  A review of rectal toxicity following permanent low dose-rate prostate brachytherapy and the potential value of biodegradable rectal spacers.

Authors:  M E Schutzer; P F Orio; M C Biagioli; D A Asher; H Lomas; D Moghanaki
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 5.554

5.  Intraoperative Registered Ultrasound and Fluoroscopy (iRUF) for dose calculation during prostate brachytherapy: Improved accuracy compared to standard ultrasound-based dosimetry.

Authors:  Junghoon Lee; Omar Y Mian; Yi Le; Hee Joon Bae; E Clif Burdette; Theodore L DeWeese; Jerry L Prince; Daniel Y Song
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 6.280

6.  Needle position during (125)I seed implantation: accurately recognized by sagittal transrectal ultrasonography [corrected].

Authors:  Hiromichi Ishiyama; Shouko Kotani; Takefumi Satoh; Mineko Uemae; Shiro Baba; Kazushige Hayakawa
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2008-10-31

Review 7.  Imaging in radiation oncology: a perspective.

Authors:  Laura A Dawson; Cynthia Ménard
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2010

8.  Influence of hydrogel spacer placement with prostate brachytherapy on rectal and urinary toxicity.

Authors:  Achiraya Teyateeti; Craig Grossman; Marisa A Kollmeier; Megan Fiasconaro; Margaret Hopkins; Sean McBride; Daniel Gorovets; Daniel Shasha; Gilad Cohen; Zhigang Zhang; David J Lesser; Antonio Damato; Michael J Zelefsky
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2021-09-02       Impact factor: 5.969

9.  Periodical assessment of genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity in patients who underwent prostate low-dose-rate brachytherapy.

Authors:  Nobumichi Tanaka; Isao Asakawa; Satoshi Anai; Akihide Hirayama; Masatoshi Hasegawa; Noboru Konishi; Kiyohide Fujimoto
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Progressive transition from pre-planned to intraoperative optimizing seed implant: post implementation analysis.

Authors:  Hsiang-Chi Kuo; William Bodner; Ravindra Yaparpalvi; Chandan Guha; Bhupendra M Tolia; Keyur J Mehta; Dennis Mah; Shalom Kalnicki
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2012-03-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.