Literature DB >> 1769277

Chromosome banding in Amphibia. XVI. High-resolution replication banding patterns in Xenopus laevis.

M Schmid1, C Steinlein.   

Abstract

High-resolution replication banding patterns were induced in prometaphase and prophase chromosomes of Xenopus laevis by treating kidney cell lines with 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) and deoxythymidine (dT) in succession. Up to 650 early and late replicating bands per haploid karyotype were demonstrated in the very long prophase chromosomes. This permits an exact identification of all chromosome pairs of X. laevis. Late replicating heterochromatin was located by analysing the time sequence of replication throughout the second half of S-phase. Neither heteromorphic sex chromosomes nor sex chromosome-specific replication bands were demonstrated in the heterogametic ZW females of X. laevis. A detailed examination of the BrdU/dT-labelled prometaphases and prophases revealed that the X. laevis chromosomes can be arranged in groups of four (quartets), most of which show conspicuous similarities in length, centromere position, and replication pattern. This is interpreted as further evidence for an ancient allotetraploid origin of X. laevis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1769277     DOI: 10.1007/bf00357062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosoma        ISSN: 0009-5915            Impact factor:   4.316


  42 in total

1.  In situ hybridization of ribosomal DNA labelled with 125iodine to metaphase and lampbrush chromosomes from newts.

Authors:  S Hennen; S Mizuno; H C Macgregor
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1975       Impact factor: 4.316

2.  Microfluorometric detection of deoxyribonucleic acid replication in human metaphase chromosomes.

Authors:  S A Latt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Chromosome complements of the genus Xenopus.

Authors:  J Tymowska; M Fischberg
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1973       Impact factor: 4.316

4.  Variation in the activity of nucleolar organizers and their ribosomal gene content.

Authors:  L Miller; D D Brown
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1969       Impact factor: 4.316

5.  [Discontinued treatment with BudR and staining with acridine orange: observation of R- or Q- or intermediary banding (author's transl)].

Authors:  B Dutrillaux
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1975-10-14       Impact factor: 4.316

6.  The mitotic chromosomes in Xenopus laevis (Daudin): normal, sex reversed and female WW.

Authors:  K Mikamo; E Witschi
Journal:  Cytogenetics       Date:  1966

7.  Cytogenetic studies of Hynobiidae (Urodela). IV. DNA replication bands (R-banding) in the genus Hynobius and the banding karyotype of Hynobius nigrescens Stejneger.

Authors:  M Kuro-o; C Ikebe; S Kohno
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  1986

8.  An international system for human cytogenetic nomenclature--high-resolution banding (1981). ISCN (1981). Report of the Standing Committee on Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature.

Authors: 
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  1981

Review 9.  Towards an understanding of the molecular mechanisms regulating gene expression during diploidization in phylogenetically polyploid lower vertebrates.

Authors:  M Leipoldt
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 4.132

10.  Evolutionary diversity of reverse (R) fluorescent chromosome bands in vertebrates.

Authors:  M Schmid; M Guttenbach
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.316

View more
  16 in total

1.  Cytogenetics of the bleak (Alburnus alburnus), with special emphasis on the B chromosomes.

Authors:  M Schmid; C G Ziegler; C Steinlein; I Nanda; M Schartl
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2006-04-20       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  Automated identification of conserved synteny after whole-genome duplication.

Authors:  Julian M Catchen; John S Conery; John H Postlethwait
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Sex-biased gene expression in a ZW sex determination system.

Authors:  John H Malone; Doyle L Hawkins; Pawel Michalak
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  Preparation of Xenopus tropicalis whole chromosome painting probes using laser microdissection and reconstruction of X. laevis tetraploid karyotype by Zoo-FISH.

Authors:  Vladimir Krylov; Svatava Kubickova; Jiri Rubes; Jaroslav Macha; Tereza Tlapakova; Eva Seifertova; Natasa Sebkova
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.239

5.  The late replication banding patterns of chromosomes are highly conserved in the genera Rana, Hyla, and Bufo (Amphibia: Anura).

Authors:  I Miura
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.316

6.  Chromosomal locations of major tRNA gene clusters of Xenopus laevis.

Authors:  S Narayanswami; J L Doering; F J Fokta; D S Rosenthal; T N Nguyen; B A Hamkalo
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.316

7.  Homoeologous chromosomes of Xenopus laevis are highly conserved after whole-genome duplication.

Authors:  Y Uno; C Nishida; C Takagi; N Ueno; Y Matsuda
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 3.821

8.  Diversity in the origins of sex chromosomes in anurans inferred from comparative mapping of sexual differentiation genes for three species of the Raninae and Xenopodinae.

Authors:  Yoshinobu Uno; Chizuko Nishida; Shin Yoshimoto; Michihiko Ito; Yuki Oshima; Satoshi Yokoyama; Masahisa Nakamura; Yoichi Matsuda
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 5.239

9.  An XX/XY heteromorphic sex chromosome system in the Australian chelid turtle Emydura macquarii: a new piece in the puzzle of sex chromosome evolution in turtles.

Authors:  Pedro Alonzo Martinez; Tariq Ezaz; Nicole Valenzuela; Arthur Georges; Jennifer A Marshall Graves
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2008-08-09       Impact factor: 5.239

10.  Coexistence of Y, W, and Z sex chromosomes in Xenopus tropicalis.

Authors:  Álvaro S Roco; Allen W Olmstead; Sigmund J Degitz; Tosikazu Amano; Lyle B Zimmerman; Mónica Bullejos
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.