Literature DB >> 17692725

A retrospective analysis of possible renal toxicity associated with vancomycin in patients with health care-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia.

Meghan N Jeffres1, Warren Isakow, Joshua A Doherty, Scott T Micek, Marin H Kollef.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this investigation was to determine whether more aggressive vancomycin dosing is associated with greater risk for renal toxicity in patients with health care-associated pneumonia (HCAP) attributed to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).
METHODS: This was a retrospective, single-center, observational cohort study. The following information was obtained for all study patients from automated hospital, microbiology, and pharmacy databases: age, sex, weight, serial serum creatinine (SCr), age- and sex-adjusted creatinine clearance (CrCl) during receipt of vancomycin, vancomycin serum trough concentrations, duration of vancomycin therapy, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores. Renal toxicity was defined as either a 0.5-mg/dL increase from baseline in SCr or a >or=50% increase in SCr based on serial SCr measurements. Data for patients who met the definition of renal toxicity were compared with data for those who did not.
RESULTS: Ninety-four patients (mean [SD]age, 59.0 [15.6] years; 59 [62.8%] men; 73 (77.7%) white; mean baseline CrCl, 70.3 [23.0] mL/min) were identified as having MRSA HCAP. Forty (42.6%) patients developed renal toxicity. Patients who developed renal toxicity were significantly more likely than patients who did not develop renal toxicity to have greater mean vancomycin serum trough concentrations (20.8 [9.9] g/mL vs 14.3 [6.7] g/mL, respectively; P < 0.001), vancomycin serum trough concentrations >or=15 g/mL (67.5% vs 40.7%; P = 0.01), and a prolonged duration (>or=14 days) of vancomycin treatment (45.0% vs 20.4%; P = 0.011). Logistic regression analysis identified a maximum vancomycin serum trough concentration of >or=15 g/mL as being independently associated with renal toxicity (adjusted odds ratio = 2.82; 95% CI, 1.02-7.74; P = 0.045). The overall mean change in CrCl for the study population was -13.5 (-16.0) mL/min (range, 0.0 to -62.6 mL/min). Patients with maximum measured vancomycin serum trough concentrations >or=15 g/mL (n = 49) had significantly greater absolute changes in CrCl compared with patients with maximum measured vancomycin serum trough concentrations <15 g/mL (n = 45) (-18.9 [-17.0] vs -7.6 [-12.5] mL/min, respectively; P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that aggressive vancomycin dosing and prolonged vancomycin administration may be associated with greater risk for renal toxicity in patients with MRSA HCAP. However, this retrospective study cannot establish causation, and a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial is needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17692725     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.06.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ther        ISSN: 0149-2918            Impact factor:   3.393


  94 in total

1.  Biopsy-proven vancomycin-associated interstitial nephritis and acute tubular necrosis.

Authors:  Naing Lin Htike; Jerome Santoro; Brett Gilbert; I Bruce Elfenbein; Geoffrey Teehan
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 2.801

2.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic evaluation of daptomycin, tigecycline, and linezolid versus vancomycin for the treatment of MRSA infections in four western European countries.

Authors:  A Canut; A Isla; C Betriu; A R Gascón
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Effect of Vancomycin-Associated Acute Kidney Injury on Incidence of 30-Day Readmissions among Hospitalized Veterans Affairs Patients with Skin and Skin Structure Infections.

Authors:  Nimish Patel; Nicholas Stornelli; Ryan J Sangiovanni; David B Huang; Thomas P Lodise
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Evaluation of a New Vancomycin Dosing Protocol in Morbidly Obese Patients.

Authors:  Desiree E Kosmisky; Carrie L Griffiths; Megan A Templin; James Norton; Kelly E Martin
Journal:  Hosp Pharm       Date:  2015-10-14

5.  Is vancomycin ototoxicity a significant risk?

Authors:  Ryan K Shields; Jay L Martello; Brian A Potoski
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Empiric weight-based vancomycin in intensive care unit patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.

Authors:  Carlos A Alvarez; Christopher A Giuliano; Krystal K Haase; Kathleen A Thompson; Christopher R Frei; Nicolas A Forcade; Sara D Brouse; Eric M Mortensen; Todd Bell; Roger J Bedimo; Nolan M Toups; Ronald G Hall
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.378

7.  Should Therapeutic Monitoring of Vancomycin Based on Area under the Curve Become Standard Practice for Patients with Confirmed or Suspected Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infection?

Authors: 
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2020-06-01

8.  Empirical Anti-MRSA vs Standard Antibiotic Therapy and Risk of 30-Day Mortality in Patients Hospitalized for Pneumonia.

Authors:  Barbara Ellen Jones; Jian Ying; Vanessa Stevens; Candace Haroldsen; Tao He; McKenna Nevers; Matthew A Christensen; Richard E Nelson; Gregory J Stoddard; Brian C Sauer; Peter M Yarbrough; Makoto M Jones; Matthew Bidwell Goetz; Tom Greene; Matthew H Samore
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 21.873

Review 9.  Use of vancomycin pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic properties in the treatment of MRSA infections.

Authors:  Christopher Giuliano; Christopher Giulano; Krystal K Haase; Ronald Hall
Journal:  Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.091

Review 10.  Bench-to-bedside review: Understanding the impact of resistance and virulence factors on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Lee P Skrupky; Scott T Micek; Marin H Kollef
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.