Literature DB >> 17692367

Clinical-pathologic and morbidity analyses of Types 2 and 3 abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.

Dirk P Pikaart1, Robert W Holloway, Sarfraz Ahmad, Neil J Finkler, Glenn E Bigsby, B Hannah Ortiz, Sara A Denardis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To provide representative data analyses of surgical morbidity and clinical-pathologic factors for Types 2 and 3 abdominal radical hysterectomies (ARH) with pelvic+/-aortic node dissection performed in a private practice with a fellowship-training program.
METHODS: From 1997 to 2005, 329 cervical cancer patients underwent ARH with lymphadenectomy. Two hundred and one cases performed at our primary institution were analyzed for operative time, blood loss, intra-operative complications, surgical-pathologic data, recurrence of disease and adjuvant therapy.
RESULTS: We evaluated 201 surgical patients who underwent Type 2 (n=45) or Type 3 (n=156) ARH with node dissection. The FIGO stages were: IB1=64%, IB2=6.5%, IA=28.4%, and IIA=1%. Aortic node dissection was performed in 64% of Type 3 cases and none of Type 2 cases. Pfannenstiel incision was used in 80% (Type 2) and 76% (Type 3) cases. A suprapubic catheter was placed in 9% of Type 2 and 81% of Type 3 cases. Median age and weight were 47+/-13 years and 149+/-35 lb. Positive nodes were identified in 12% of Type 3 and 2.2% of Type 2 cases. No positive aortic nodes were found. For Types 2 and 3 ARH, median operative time was 80+/-19 vs. 99+/-23 min (p<0.001) and blood loss was 250+/-134 vs. 300+/-234 ml (p<0.001). The transfusion rate was 3%. Intra-operative complications included: 3 ureteral injuries and 1 colotomy. Tumor histology was 60% squamous, 37% adenocarcinoma, 1% adenosquamous, and 2% others.
CONCLUSIONS: ARH with pelvic lymphadenectomy in modern practice is an efficient, safe procedure with low transfusion rate and shorter hospital stay than previously reported. Data will be useful as comparison when scrutinizing novel approaches to radical hysterectomy including robotic-assisted and laparoscopic techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17692367     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.06.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  9 in total

1.  The twenty-first century role of Piver-Rutledge type III radical hysterectomy and FIGO stage IA, IB1, and IB2 cervical cancer in the era of robotic surgery: a personal perspective.

Authors:  M Steven Piver; Ali Ghomi
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 4.401

2.  Comparison of a novel surgical approach for radical hysterectomy: robotic assistance versus open surgery.

Authors:  Gerald Feuer; Benedict Benigno; Lindal Krige; Patricia Alvarez
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2009-10-09

3.  Clear cell carcinoma of the cervix: a multi-institutional review in the post-DES era.

Authors:  M Bijoy Thomas; Jason D Wright; Aliza L Leiser; Dennis S Chi; David G Mutch; Karl C Podratz; Sean C Dowdy
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2008-04-03       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  Radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy: indications, technique, and complications.

Authors:  Rachel A Ware; John R van Nagell
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2010-09-01

5.  Postoperative surgical complications of lymphadenohysterocolpectomy.

Authors:  F Marin; M Pleşca; C I Bordea; S C Voinea; I Burlănescu; E Ichim; C G Jianu; R R Nicolăescu; M P Teodosie; K Maher; A Blidaru
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2014-03-25

Review 6.  Fertility-sparing management in cervical cancer: balancing oncologic outcomes with reproductive success.

Authors:  Karla Willows; Genevieve Lennox; Allan Covens
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Res Pract       Date:  2016-10-21

7.  Profile of treatment-related complications in women with clinical stage IB-IIB cervical cancer: A nationwide cohort study in Japan.

Authors:  Hiroko Machida; Koji Matsuo; Akiko Furusawa; Tsunekazu Kita; Ryo Kitagawa; Mikio Mikami
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Application of gene expression programming and neural networks to predict adverse events of radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients.

Authors:  Maciej Kusy; Bogdan Obrzut; Jacek Kluska
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 2.602

9.  Evolution of radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer along the last two decades: single institution experience.

Authors:  Claudia Arispe; Ana Isabel Pomares; Javier De Santiago; Ignacio Zapardiel
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 5.087

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.