Literature DB >> 17691892

Assessing significance of connectivity and conservation in protein interaction networks.

Mehmet Koyutürk1, Wojciech Szpankowski, Ananth Grama.   

Abstract

Comparative analyses of cellular interaction networks enable understanding of the cell's modular organization through identification of functional modules and complexes. These techniques often rely on topological features such as connectedness and density, based on the premise that functionally related proteins are likely to interact densely and that these interactions follow similar evolutionary trajectories. Significant recent work has focused on efficient algorithms for identification of such functional modules and their conservation. In spite of algorithmic advances, development of a comprehensive infrastructure for interaction databases is in relative infancy compared to corresponding sequence analysis tools. One critical, and as yet unresolved aspect of this infrastructure is a measure of the statistical significance of a match, or a dense subcomponent. In the absence of analytical measures, conventional methods rely on computationally expensive simulations based on ad-hoc models for quantifying significance. In this paper, we present techniques for analytically quantifying statistical significance of dense components in reference model graphs. We consider two reference models--a G(n, p) model in which each pair of nodes in a graph has an identical likelihood, p, of sharing an edge, and a two-level G(n, p) model, which accounts for high-degree hub nodes generally observed in interaction networks. Experiments performed on a rich collection of protein interaction (PPI) networks show that the proposed model provides a reliable means of evaluating statistical significance of dense patterns in these networks. We also adapt existing state-of-the-art network clustering algorithms by using our statistical significance measure as an optimization criterion. Comparison of the resulting module identification algorithm, SIDES, with existing methods shows that SIDES outperforms existing algorithms in terms of sensitivity and specificity of identified clusters with respect to available GO annotations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17691892     DOI: 10.1089/cmb.2007.R014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Biol        ISSN: 1066-5277            Impact factor:   1.479


  13 in total

1.  Connectedness of PPI network neighborhoods identifies regulatory hub proteins.

Authors:  Andrew D Fox; Benjamin J Hescott; Anselm C Blumer; Donna K Slonim
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 2.  Algorithmic and analytical methods in network biology.

Authors:  Mehmet Koyutürk
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med       Date:  2010 May-Jun

3.  Enumeration of condition-dependent dense modules in protein interaction networks.

Authors:  Elisabeth Georgii; Sabine Dietmann; Takeaki Uno; Philipp Pagel; Koji Tsuda
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Module discovery by exhaustive search for densely connected, co-expressed regions in biomolecular interaction networks.

Authors:  Recep Colak; Flavia Moser; Jeffrey Shih-Chieh Chu; Alexander Schönhuth; Nansheng Chen; Martin Ester
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Measuring the physical cohesiveness of proteins using physical interaction enrichment.

Authors:  Iziah Edwin Sama; Martijn A Huynen
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  Convergent evolution of modularity in metabolic networks through different community structures.

Authors:  Wanding Zhou; Luay Nakhleh
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 3.260

7.  Modelling human protein interaction networks as metric spaces has potential in disease research and drug target discovery.

Authors:  Emad Fadhal; Eric C Mwambene; Junaid Gamieldien
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2014-06-14

8.  Human liver rate-limiting enzymes influence metabolic flux via branch points and inhibitors.

Authors:  Min Zhao; Hong Qu
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  GIBA: a clustering tool for detecting protein complexes.

Authors:  Charalampos N Moschopoulos; Georgios A Pavlopoulos; Reinhard Schneider; Spiridon D Likothanassis; Sophia Kossida
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Protein interaction networks as metric spaces: a novel perspective on distribution of hubs.

Authors:  Emad Fadhal; Junaid Gamieldien; Eric C Mwambene
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2014-01-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.