Literature DB >> 17691593

Iron(III)-hydroxide polymaltose complex in iron deficiency anemia / review and meta-analysis.

Jorge E Toblli1, Reto Brignoli.   

Abstract

Iron(III)-hydroxide polymaltose complex (IPC) is an iron preparation with non-ionic iron and polymaltose in a stable complex. The usefulness of IPC in the treatment of iron deficiency anemia (IDA) has recently been a topic of much debate. By reviewing the published literature an overview is provided of the existing comparative evidence vs. ferrous sulfate as reference. For this purpose the standard methods and criteria as described by the Cochrane group are employed. The aim was to establish whether there are differences concerning efficacy (primary end-point: hemoglobin after approx. 2 months of treatment) and concerning safety (number of patients with adverse drug reactions [ADRs]). From an initial group of 14 comparative trials identified, 6 comparative studies (1 double blind) conducted in adults could be retained for analysis. Four pediatric studies initially selected had to be rejected because of heterogeneity of data at baseline. In adults (319 IPC, 238 ferrous sulfate) at the end of the study period (8-13 weeks) the mean hemoglobin values were 12.13 +/- 1.19 g/dl with IPC vs. 11.94 +/- 1.84 g/dl with ferrous sulfate (weighted mean difference WMD = 0.01 [95% CI -0.23, 0.21] g/dl). Not all studies reported on ferremia (higher with IPC), transferrin saturation (no difference) or ferritin (lower with IPC). Adverse drug reactions were reported less frequently with IPC (14.9%) than with ferrous sulfate (34.1%; p < 0.001), particularly upper digestive troubles, stained teeth and diarrhea. The meta-analysis of studies conducted in adult patients with iron deficiency anemia, comparing IPC with ferrous sulfate in equivalent doses, showed that the two compounds attained similar hemoglobin levels, thus suggesting similar efficacy. The tolerance of IPC in adults was clearly better than that of ferrous sulfate; the differences were also significant for the individual adverse reactions. This probably reflects a better risk/benefit ratio of IPC in adults. Properly conducted randomized controlled trials, particularly in pediatrics, are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17691593     DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1296692

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arzneimittelforschung        ISSN: 0004-4172


  7 in total

1.  Lactoferrin versus iron hydroxide polymaltose complex for the treatment of iron deficiency anemia in children with cerebral palsy: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Omneya M Omar; Hala Assem; Doaa Ahmed; Marwa S Abd Elmaksoud
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 3.183

2.  Intravenous iron therapy: how far have we come?

Authors:  Rodolfo Delfini Cançado; Manuel Muñoz
Journal:  Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter       Date:  2011

Review 3.  Refining Treatment Strategies for Iron Deficient Athletes.

Authors:  Rachel McCormick; Marc Sim; Brian Dawson; Peter Peeling
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Efficacy, Tolerability, and Acceptability of Iron Hydroxide Polymaltose Complex versus Ferrous Sulfate: A Randomized Trial in Pediatric Patients with Iron Deficiency Anemia.

Authors:  Beril Yasa; Leyla Agaoglu; Emin Unuvar
Journal:  Int J Pediatr       Date:  2011-10-31

5.  Ferrous sulfate, but not iron polymaltose complex, aggravates local and systemic inflammation and oxidative stress in dextran sodium sulfate-induced colitis in rats.

Authors:  Jorge E Toblli; Gabriel Cao; Margarita Angerosa
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 4.162

Review 6.  Diagnosis and treatment of iron deficiency anemia during pregnancy and the postpartum period: Iron deficiency anemia working group consensus report.

Authors:  Olus Api; Christian Breyman; Mustafa Çetiner; Cansun Demir; Tevfik Ecder
Journal:  Turk J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-09-15

7.  Effectiveness of iron polymaltose complex in treatment and prevention of iron deficiency anemia in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ritzzaleena Rosli Mohd Rosli; Shaiful Bahari Ismail; Mohd Noor Norhayati
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 2.984

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.