Literature DB >> 17691313

Clinical experience with vagus nerve stimulation and deep brain stimulation in epilepsy.

P Boon1, V De Herdt, K Vonck, D Van Roost.   

Abstract

Patients with refractory epilepsy present a particular challenge to new therapies. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) for the control of intractable seizures has become available since 1989. VNS is a relatively noninvasive treatment. It reduces seizure frequency by > or =50% in 1/3 of patients; an additional 1/3 of patients experience a worthwhile reduction of seizure frequency between 30 and 50%. In the remaining 1/3 of the patients there is little or no effect. Efficacy has a tendency to improve with longer duration of treatment up to 18 months postoperatively. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) or direct electrical stimulation of brain areas is an alternative neurostimulation modality. The cerebellum, various thalamic nuclei, the pallidum, and, more recently, medial temporal lobe structures have been chosen as targets. DBS for epilepsy is beyond the stage of proof-of-concept but still needs thorough evaluation in confirmatory pilot studies before it can be offered to larger patient populations. Analysis of larger patient groups and insight in the mode of action may help to identify patients with epileptic seizures or syndromes that respond better either to VNS or to DBS. Randomized and controlled studies in larger patient series are mandatory to identify the potential treatment population and optimal stimulation paradigms. Further improvements of clinical efficacy may result from these studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17691313     DOI: 10.1007/978-3-211-33081-4_30

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir Suppl        ISSN: 0065-1419


  6 in total

Review 1.  Magnetoencephalography for pediatric epilepsy: how we do it.

Authors:  E S Schwartz; D J Dlugos; P B Storm; J Dell; R Magee; T P Flynn; D M Zarnow; R A Zimmerman; T P L Roberts
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  Commentary: physical approaches for the treatment of epilepsy: electrical and magnetic stimulation and cooling.

Authors:  Wolfgang Löscher; Andrew J Cole; Michael J McLean
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 7.620

3.  The P3 event-related potential is a biomarker for the efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation in patients with epilepsy.

Authors:  Leen De Taeye; Kristl Vonck; Marlies van Bochove; Paul Boon; Dirk Van Roost; Lies Mollet; Alfred Meurs; Veerle De Herdt; Evelien Carrette; Ine Dauwe; Stefanie Gadeyne; Pieter van Mierlo; Tom Verguts; Robrecht Raedt
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 7.620

4.  Cerebellar Directed Optogenetic Intervention Inhibits Spontaneous Hippocampal Seizures in a Mouse Model of Temporal Lobe Epilepsy.

Authors:  Esther Krook-Magnuson; Gergely G Szabo; Caren Armstrong; Mikko Oijala; Ivan Soltesz
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2014-12

Review 5.  And Then There Was Light: Perspectives of Optogenetics for Deep Brain Stimulation and Neuromodulation.

Authors:  Jean Delbeke; Luis Hoffman; Katrien Mols; Dries Braeken; Dimiter Prodanov
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Evidence-Based Guidelines and Secondary Meta-Analysis for the Use of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders.

Authors:  Felipe Fregni; Mirret M El-Hagrassy; Kevin Pacheco-Barrios; Sandra Carvalho; Jorge Leite; Marcel Simis; Jerome Brunelin; Ester Miyuki Nakamura-Palacios; Paola Marangolo; Ganesan Venkatasubramanian; Daniel San-Juan; Wolnei Caumo; Marom Bikson; André R Brunoni
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 5.176

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.