Literature DB >> 17691288

Motor cortex stimulation for chronic non-malignant pain: current state and future prospects.

B Cioni1, M Meglio.   

Abstract

Motor cortex stimulation (MCS) was proposed by Tsubokawa in 1991 for the treatment of post-stroke thalamic pain. Since that time, the indications have been increased and included trigeminal neuropathic pain and later other types of central and peripheral deafferentation pain. The results reported in the literature are quite good; the mean long-term success rate is 80% in facial pain and 53% in non-facial pain. Our own results are less impressive: 4 of 14 patients (28%) experienced a greater than 40% pain relief, but in 2 of them the effect faded with time. Only few minor complications have been reported. The accurate placement of the epidural electrode over the motor cortex that somatotopically corresponds to the painful area is believed to be essential for pain relief. Predictive factors included the response to pharmacological tests, the relative sparing from the disease process of the cortico-spinal tract and the sensory system, and the analgesic response achieved during the test period of MCS. A possible predictive factor might be a test of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the motor cortex. MCS may act by rebalancing the control of non-nociceptive sensory inputs over nociceptive afferents at cortical, thalamic, brainstem and spinal level. In addition, it may interfere with the emotional component of nociceptive perception. Biochemical processes involving endorphins and GABA may also be implicated in the mechanism of MCS. It is time for a large multicenter prospective randomized double blind study evaluating not only the effect of MCS on pain (based on the available guidelines for assessment of neuropathic pain), but also the optimal electrode placement and stimulation parameters, and the possible relationship with the response to rTMS. New electrode design and a new generation of stimulators may help in improving the results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17691288     DOI: 10.1007/978-3-211-33081-4_5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir Suppl        ISSN: 0065-1419


  8 in total

Review 1.  Non-invasive Brain Stimulation for Central Neuropathic Pain.

Authors:  Qi-Hao Yang; Yong-Hui Zhang; Shu-Hao Du; Yu-Chen Wang; Yu Fang; Xue-Qiang Wang
Journal:  Front Mol Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 6.261

2.  Extradural Motor Cortex Stimulation might improve episodic and working memory in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Carla Piano; Marco Ciavarro; Francesco Bove; Daniela Di Giuda; Fabrizio Cocciolillo; Anna Rita Bentivoglio; Beatrice Cioni; Tommaso Tufo; Paolo Calabresi; Antonio Daniele
Journal:  NPJ Parkinsons Dis       Date:  2020-09-28

Review 3.  Cerebral cortex modulation of pain.

Authors:  Yu-feng Xie; Fu-quan Huo; Jing-shi Tang
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 4.  Burst Motor Cortex Stimulation Evokes Sustained Suppression of Thalamic Stroke Pain: A Narrative Review and Single-Case Overview.

Authors:  Martin Nüssel; Melanie Hamperl; Anna Maslarova; Shafqat R Chaudhry; Julia Köhn; Andreas Stadlbauer; Michael Buchfelder; Thomas Kinfe
Journal:  Pain Ther       Date:  2020-12-16

5.  Motor cortex stimulation for facial chronic neuropathic pain: A review of the literature.

Authors:  Guillermo A Monsalve
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2012-10-31

6.  Prolonged Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation Can Regulate Sensitivity on Aβ Fibers: An Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Study.

Authors:  Chong Li; Nannan Zhang; Qiong Han; Lifang Zhang; Shuo Xu; Shuting Tu; Yong Xie; Zhiyong Wang
Journal:  Front Mol Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 5.639

7.  Motor Cortex Stimulation for Pain Relief: Do Corollary Discharges Play a Role?

Authors:  Joaquim P Brasil-Neto
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Pain modulation effect on motor cortex after optogenetic stimulation in shPKCγ knockdown dorsal root ganglion-compressed Sprague-Dawley rat model.

Authors:  Jaisan Islam; Elina Kc; Byeong Ho Oh; Hyeong Cheol Moon; Young Seok Park
Journal:  Mol Pain       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.395

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.