Literature DB >> 17691107

Patients with renal cell carcinoma nodal metastases can be accurately identified: external validation of a new nomogram.

Georg C Hutterer1, Jean-Jacques Patard, Paul Perrotte, Constantin Ionescu, Alexandre de La Taille, Laurent Salomon, Gregory Verhoest, Jacques Tostain, Luca Cindolo, Vincenzo Ficarra, Walter Artibani, Luigi Schips, Richard Zigeuner, Peter F Mulders, Antoine Valeri, Denis Chautard, Jean-Luc Descotes, Jean-Jacques Rambeaud, Arnaud Mejean, Pierre I Karakiewicz.   

Abstract

Outcome of patients with renal cell carcinoma nodal metastases (NM) is substantially worse than that of patients with localized disease. This justifies more thorough staging and possibly more aggressive treatment in those at risk of or with established NM. We developed and externally validated a nomogram capable of highly accurately predicting renal cell carcinoma NM in patients without radiographic evidence of distant metastases. Age, symptom classification, tumour size and the pathological nodal stage were available for 4,658 individuals. The data of 2,522 (54.1%) individuals from 7 centers were used to develop a multivariable logistic regression model-based nomogram predicting the individual probability of NM. The remaining data from 2,136 (45.9%) patients from 5 institutions were used for external validation. In the development cohort, 107/2,522 (4.2%) had lymph node metastases vs. 100/2,136 (4.7%) in the external validation cohort. Symptom classification and tumour size were independent predictors of NM in the development cohort. Age failed to reach independent predictor status, but added to discriminant properties of the model. A nomogram based on age, symptom classification and tumour size was 78.4% accurate in predicting the individual probability of NM in the external validation cohort. Our nomogram can contribute to the identification of patients at low risk of NM. This tool can help to risk adjust the need and the extent of nodal staging in patients without known distant metastases. More thorough staging can hopefully better select those in whom adjuvant treatment is necessary. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17691107     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.23010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  16 in total

1.  Development and external validation of a pathological nodal staging score for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Malte Rieken; Stephen A Boorjian; Luis A Kluth; Umberto Capitanio; Alberto Briganti; R Houston Thompson; Bradley C Leibovich; Laura-Maria Krabbe; Vitaly Margulis; Jay D Raman; Mikhail Regelman; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Morgan Rouprêt; Mohammad Abufaraj; Beat Foerster; Mithat Gönen; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  The survival benefit of lymph node dissection at the time of removal of kidney, prostate and urothelial carcinomas: what is the evidence?

Authors:  Karim Bensalah; Morgan Roupret; Evanguelos Xylinas; Shahrokh Shariat
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Sentinel lymph node biopsy in renal malignancy: The past, present and future.

Authors:  Tharani Mahesan; Alberto Coscione; Ben Ayres; Nick Watkin
Journal:  World J Nephrol       Date:  2016-03-06

4.  Trends and outcomes of lymphadenectomy for nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma: A propensity score-weighted analysis of the National Cancer Database.

Authors:  Nicholas J Farber; Zorimar Rivera-Núñez; Sinae Kim; Brian Shinder; Kushan Radadia; Joshua Sterling; Parth K Modi; Sharad Goyal; Rahul Parikh; Tina M Mayer; Robert E Weiss; Isaac Y Kim; Sammy E Elsamra; Thomas L Jang; Eric A Singer
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 3.498

5.  Lymph node dissection during cytoreductive nephrectomy: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Michael A Feuerstein; Matthew Kent; Melanie Bernstein; Paul Russo
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 3.369

Review 6.  The role of lymph node dissection in renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Brian F Chapin; Scott E Delacroix; Christopher G Wood
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Retroperitoneal Lymphadenectomy for High Risk, Nonmetastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: An Analysis of the ASSURE (ECOG-ACRIN 2805) Adjuvant Trial.

Authors:  Benjamin T Ristau; Judi Manola; Naomi B Haas; Daniel Y C Heng; Edward M Messing; Christopher G Wood; Christopher J Kane; Robert S DiPaola; Robert G Uzzo
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 8.  The rationale and the role of lymph node dissection in renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Umberto Capitanio; Bradley C Leibovich
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Predictive and prognostic effect of inflammatory lymphadenopathies in renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Fabio Muttin; Angela Pecoraro; Alessandro Larcher; Paolo Dell'Oglio; Alessandro Nini; Francesco Cianflone; Francesco Trevisani; Federico Dehò; Alberto Briganti; Andrea Salonia; Francesco Montorsi; Roberto Bertini; Umberto Capitanio
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Staging of renal cell carcinoma: Current concepts.

Authors:  John S Lam; Tobias Klatte; Alberto Breda
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2009 Oct-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.