Literature DB >> 17690384

Development and validation of a brief mental health screening instrument for newly incarcerated adults.

Julian D Ford1, Robert L Trestman, Valerie Wiesbrock.   

Abstract

The authors report the development and initial psychometric evaluation of gender-specific brief screening instruments to identify undetected psychiatric impairment on incarceration. Women and men completed the Correctional Mental Health Screen (CMHS), a 56-item screen derived from validated measures. Representative subsamples completed structured diagnostic interviews within 5 days. An 8-item screen for women and a 12-item screen for men identified inmates with current Axis I psychiatric disorders with 83% to 100% accuracy on the basis of cut points chosen to maximize negative predictive power. The CMHS showed evidence of incremental predictive utility compared with two previously validated correctional mental health screening measures with White and Black men and White women. Incremental validity was not supported with Black women, for whom the CMHS performed well in identifying true cases but not in ruling out noncases. Analyses of internal consistency, interrater, and retest reliability and convergent, discriminant, and criterion validity supported the psychometric status of the CMHS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17690384     DOI: 10.1177/1073191107302944

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Assessment        ISSN: 1073-1911


  6 in total

1.  Exploring Racial Disparities in The Brief Jail Mental Health Screen.

Authors:  Seth J Prins; Fred C Osher; Henry J Steadman; Pamela Clark Robbins; Brian Case
Journal:  Crim Justice Behav       Date:  2012-03-15

2.  Results of the Brief Jail Mental Health Screen Across Repeated Jail Bookings.

Authors:  Samantha A Zottola; Sarah L Desmarais; Shevaun D Neupert; Lin Dong; Eric Laber; Evan M Lowder; Richard A Van Dorn
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 3.084

3.  The abdominal drawing-in manoeuvre for detecting activity in the deep abdominal muscles: is this clinical tool reliable and valid?

Authors:  Karsten Kaping; Björn O Äng; Eva Rasmussen-Barr
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 4.  Mental health screening tools in correctional institutions: a systematic review.

Authors:  Michael S Martin; Ian Colman; Alexander I F Simpson; Kwame McKenzie
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 3.630

5.  Psychometric Properties and Clinical Usefulness of the Youth Self-Report DSM-Oriented Scales: A Field Study among Detained Male Adolescents.

Authors:  Olivier F Colins
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  A Systematic Review of Reviews of Correctional Mental Health Services Using the STAIR Framework.

Authors:  Alexander I F Simpson; Cory Gerritsen; Margaret Maheandiran; Vito Adamo; Tobias Vogel; Lindsay Fulham; Tamsen Kitt; Andrew Forrester; Roland M Jones
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 4.157

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.