Literature DB >> 17690231

Male discrimination of receptive and unreceptive female calls by temporal features.

Taffeta M Elliott1, Darcy B Kelley.   

Abstract

In murky, crowded ponds in South Africa, female clawed frogs, Xenopus laevis (Daudin), vocalize to signal reproductive state. Female calls consist of acoustically similar clicks delivered in trains with characteristic rates. The rapping call of a sexually receptive female has a more rapid click rate [81 ms mean interclick interval (ICI)] than the ticking call of an unreceptive female (219 ms ICI). Rapping stimulates male advertisement calling, whereas ticking suppresses an already calling male. We examined how males label and discriminate female click rates. A labeling boundary experiment revealed that males perceive click rates between the means of rapping and ticking as lying on a continuum. They respond to 98 and 160 ms ICI as though to rapping and ticking, respectively. However, calling evoked by a click rate equally common to both calls (120 ms ICI) did not differ from the response to either rapping or ticking. A second experiment evaluated whether males discriminate click rates both labeled as ticking (180 and 219 ms ICI). Ticking suppresses advertising males, and suppressed males habituate (resume calling) to prolonged ticking. Both ticking stimuli suppressed males with equal effectiveness, and males habituated in equivalent amounts of time. When the stimulus was switched during habituation, no dishabituation occurred. We conclude that male labeling of click trains as rapping or ticking reflects an ambiguity resulting from the overlap in ICIs naturally occurring in the calls. Males do not respond differentially to click rates within the ticking category. Males thus combine discriminating and non-discriminating strategies in responding to the salient feature of female calls.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17690231      PMCID: PMC3493248          DOI: 10.1242/jeb.003988

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  12 in total

1.  The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries.

Authors:  A M LIBERMAN; K S HARRIS; H S HOFFMAN; B C GRIFFITH
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1957-11

2.  Mental representations for musical meter.

Authors:  C Palmer; C L Krumhansl
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Categorical perception of a natural stimulus continuum: birdsong.

Authors:  D A Nelson; P Marler
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-05-26       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Categorical perception of sound frequency by crickets.

Authors:  R A Wyttenbach; M L May; R R Hoy
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-09-13       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Perceptual organization of auditory temporal patterns in European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris).

Authors:  R F Braaten; S H Hulse
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-11

6.  Significance of temporal and spectral acoustic cues for sexual recognition in Xenopus laevis.

Authors:  Clémentine Vignal; Darcy Kelley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Vocal communication between male Xenopus laevis.

Authors:  Martha L Tobias; Candace Barnard; Robert O'Hagan; Sam H Horng; Masha Rand; Darcy B Kelley
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2003-12-29       Impact factor: 2.844

8.  Discrimination of intermediate sounds in a synthetic call continuum by female green tree frogs.

Authors:  H C Gerhardt
Journal:  Science       Date:  1978-03-10       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Androgen and gonadotropin effects on male mate calls in South African clawed frogs, Xenopus laevis.

Authors:  D M Wetzel; D B Kelley
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 3.587

10.  Vocalizations by a sexually dimorphic isolated larynx: peripheral constraints on behavioral expression.

Authors:  M L Tobias; D B Kelley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  10 in total

1.  Temporally selective processing of communication signals by auditory midbrain neurons.

Authors:  Taffeta M Elliott; Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard; Darcy B Kelley
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  Probing forebrain to hindbrain circuit functions in Xenopus.

Authors:  Darcy B Kelley; Taffeta M Elliott; Ben J Evans; Ian C Hall; Elizabeth C Leininger; Heather J Rhodes; Ayako Yamaguchi; Erik Zornik
Journal:  Genesis       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.487

Review 3.  Female sexual arousal in amphibians.

Authors:  Walter Wilczynski; Kathleen S Lynch
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 3.587

Review 4.  Generation, Coordination, and Evolution of Neural Circuits for Vocal Communication.

Authors:  Darcy B Kelley; Irene H Ballagh; Charlotte L Barkan; Andres Bendesky; Taffeta M Elliott; Ben J Evans; Ian C Hall; Young Mi Kwon; Ursula Kwong-Brown; Elizabeth C Leininger; Emilie C Perez; Heather J Rhodes; Avelyne Villain; Ayako Yamaguchi; Erik Zornik
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  The Xenopus amygdala mediates socially appropriate vocal communication signals.

Authors:  Ian C Hall; Irene H Ballagh; Darcy B Kelley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  A neuroendocrine basis for the hierarchical control of frog courtship vocalizations.

Authors:  Erik Zornik; Darcy B Kelley
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 8.606

7.  Tone and call responses of units in the auditory nerve and dorsal medullary nucleus of Xenopus laevis.

Authors:  Taffeta M Elliott; Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard; Darcy B Kelley
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Reciprocal Matched Filtering in the Inner Ear of the African Clawed Frog (Xenopus laevis).

Authors:  Ariadna Cobo-Cuan; Peter M Narins
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-01-06

9.  Male-male clasping may be part of an alternative reproductive tactic in Xenopus laevis.

Authors:  Heather J Rhodes; Rachel J Stevenson; Courtney L Ego
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Auditory perception exhibits sexual dimorphism and left telencephalic dominance in Xenopus laevis.

Authors:  Yanzhu Fan; Xizi Yue; Fei Xue; Jianguo Cui; Steven E Brauth; Yezhong Tang; Guangzhan Fang
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 2.422

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.