Literature DB >> 17689363

Differential responses to cannabis potency: a typology of users based on self-reported consumption behaviour.

Dirk J Korf1, Annemieke Benschop, Marije Wouters.   

Abstract

AIMS: To determine whether a classification of cannabis users into different types can help to clarify the relationship between cannabis potency and consumption behaviour, harmful physical effects and psychological dependency.
METHODS: A field sample of 388 respondents was recruited who had smoked cannabis at least once in the past month. They were contacted and interviewed in 28 cannabis coffee shops located in five Dutch cities. Data were collected with an assisted self-completion questionnaire. Cluster analysis was performed using the k-means method.
FINDINGS: Various ways were observed in which cannabis users in natural settings adjusted their intake to the potency of the drug. Cluster analysis identified three broad types of cannabis users. The strongest high type was the youngest, consumed the highest monthly dose, inhaled higher-potency cannabis more deeply, and scored highest on psychological cannabis dependency. The consistent high type preferred milder cannabis, consumed the lowest monthly dose, and compensated for stronger cannabis by inhaling less deeply and smoking less. The steady quantity type was the oldest, usually smoked alone, consumed an intermediate monthly dose, and did not tend to adjust the depth of inhalation to the potency of the cannabis. The results suggest that this typology might also reflect three successive stages in the careers of continuing cannabis users.
CONCLUSIONS: Laboratory studies to assess the effects of higher THC concentrations on external and internal exposure to cannabis should allow for the possibility that the types of users studied can affect the results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17689363     DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2006.08.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Drug Policy        ISSN: 0955-3959


  7 in total

1.  Alcohol Use and Risk of Related Problems Among Cannabis Users Is Lower Among Those With Medical Cannabis Recommendations, Though Not Due To Health.

Authors:  Meenakshi S Subbaraman; William C Kerr
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.582

Review 2.  Understanding and learning from the diversification of cannabis supply laws.

Authors:  Beau Kilmer; Rosalie Liccardo Pacula
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2016-11-27       Impact factor: 6.526

3.  Subgroup trends in alcohol and cannabis co-use and related harms during the rollout of recreational cannabis legalization in Washington state.

Authors:  Meenakshi S Subbaraman; William C Kerr
Journal:  Int J Drug Policy       Date:  2019-07-24

4.  Effects of cannabidiol in cannabis flower: Implications for harm reduction.

Authors:  Laurel P Gibson; Hollis C Karoly; Jarrod M Ellingson; Jost Klawitter; Cristina Sempio; Julia E Squeri; Angela D Bryan; L Cinnamon Bidwell; Kent E Hutchison
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 4.093

5.  Associations of mode of administration on cannabis consumption and subjective intoxication in daily life.

Authors:  Renee M Cloutier; Brian H Calhoun; Ashley N Linden-Carmichael
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2021-09-02

6.  The Dutch Cannabis Dependence (CanDep) study on the course of frequent cannabis use and dependence: objectives, methods and sample characteristics.

Authors:  Peggy van der Pol; Nienke Liebregts; Ron de Graaf; Dirk J Korf; Wim van den Brink; Margriet van Laar
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 4.035

7.  Analysis of cannabis seizures in NSW, Australia: cannabis potency and cannabinoid profile.

Authors:  Wendy Swift; Alex Wong; Kong M Li; Jonathon C Arnold; Iain S McGregor
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.