Literature DB >> 17688948

What neuroimaging tells us about sensory substitution.

Colline Poirier1, Anne G De Volder, Christian Scheiber.   

Abstract

A major question in the field of sensory substitution concerns the nature of the perception generated by sensory substitution prostheses. Is the perception determined by the nature of the substitutive modality or is it determined by the nature of the information transmitted by the device? Is it a totally new, amodal, perception? This paper reviews the recent neuroimaging studies which have investigated the neural bases of sensory substitution. The detailed analysis of available results led us to propose a general scheme of the neural mechanisms underlying sensory substitution. Two different main processes may be responsible for the visual area recruitment observed in the different studies: cross-modality and mental (visual) imagery. Based on our results analysis, we propose that cross-modality is the predominant process in early blind subjects whereas mental imagery is predominant in blindfolded sighted subjects. This model implies that, with training, sensory substitution mainly induces visual-like perception in sighted subjects and mainly auditory or tactile perception in blind subjects. This framework leads us to make some predictions that could easily be tested.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17688948     DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.05.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev        ISSN: 0149-7634            Impact factor:   8.989


  15 in total

1.  Sustained cortical and subcortical neuromodulation induced by electrical tongue stimulation.

Authors:  Joseph C Wildenberg; Mitchell E Tyler; Yuri P Danilov; Kurt A Kaczmarek; Mary E Meyerand
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.978

2.  High-resolution fMRI detects neuromodulation of individual brainstem nuclei by electrical tongue stimulation in balance-impaired individuals.

Authors:  Joseph C Wildenberg; Mitchell E Tyler; Yuri P Danilov; Kurt A Kaczmarek; Mary E Meyerand
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 3.  Mental imagery in animals: Learning, memory, and decision-making in the face of missing information.

Authors:  Aaron P Blaisdell
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 4.  The imaginative mind.

Authors:  Anna Abraham
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 5.  Cross-modal plasticity for the spatial processing of sounds in visually deprived subjects.

Authors:  Olivier Collignon; Patrice Voss; Maryse Lassonde; Franco Lepore
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Functional recruitment of visual cortex for sound encoded object identification in the blind.

Authors:  Lotfi B Merabet; Lorella Battelli; Souzana Obretenova; Sara Maguire; Peter Meijer; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 1.837

7.  Clinical Tests of Ultra-Low Vision Used to Evaluate Rudimentary Visual Perceptions Enabled by the BrainPort Vision Device.

Authors:  Amy Nau; Michael Bach; Christopher Fisher
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 3.283

8.  Reading the World through the Skin and Ears: A New Perspective on Sensory Substitution.

Authors:  Ophelia Deroy; Malika Auvray
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-11-07

9.  Recruitment of occipital cortex during sensory substitution training linked to subjective experience of seeing in people with blindness.

Authors:  Tomás Ortiz; Joaquín Poch; Juan M Santos; Carmen Requena; Ana M Martínez; Laura Ortiz-Terán; Agustín Turrero; Juan Barcia; Ramón Nogales; Agustín Calvo; José M Martínez; José L Córdoba; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Training-induced plasticity enables visualizing sounds with a visual-to-auditory conversion device.

Authors:  Jacques Pesnot Lerousseau; Gabriel Arnold; Malika Auvray
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.