INTRODUCTION: The biopsychosocial factors that affect or influence empathy in the doctor-patient with multiple disease (PMD) relationship are unknown. This study aimed to determine the patient's own and external factors (from a biopsychosocial point of view) associated to a better empathic relation with health professionals in a multicenter cohort obtained from a population basis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The multicenter cohort was obtained from four basic health zones, 3 urban and one periurban, from the province of Seville (Southwestern Spain). Empathy was measured with the Likert scale (1-5), by means of an interview (differentiating between family doctor, family nurse and reference internist), by a member of the research team who was not related with patient's care. After that, a factorial analysis was performed, obtaining global empathy as a factor (maximum likelihood method, the summarized three variable matrix, ranging from 0.44 to 0.85). The possible predictive factors of global empathy were chosen from clinical-demographic care features of PMD. Comparisons between groups were performed with the Student's t and ANOVA tests. Correlations were with Pearson correlation quotient. Finally a multivariant analysis was done by linear regression and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Four hundred and sixty (69%) of 662 eligible PMD from the cohort answered the interview. Empathy with family doctor, family nurse and reference internist was 4.39 +/- 0.98; 4.49 +/- 0.87 and 4.48 +/- 0.48, respectively. The median of the global empathy factor was 0.33 (-4.7-1.2). Global empathy was associated to having telephone access to the family doctor (0.56 vs 0.22; p < 0.0001) and to the family nurse (0.58 vs 0.24, p = 0.05), and was inversely correlated with global Gijon scale (r -0.100; p = 0.031) and with two of its dimensions: support (r -0.145; p = 0.002), and income (r -0.167; p < 0.0001). In the multivariant analysis, social evaluation measured by the Gijon index (p = 0.001) and number of drugs prescribed (p = 0.004) independently predicted global empathy. CONCLUSION: In the PMD multicenter cohort, both empathy level with the different health professionals and global empathy were high. The latter was associated with having telephone access to the family doctor and nurse, with number of drugs prescribed and with a good social and family support status.
INTRODUCTION: The biopsychosocial factors that affect or influence empathy in the doctor-patient with multiple disease (PMD) relationship are unknown. This study aimed to determine the patient's own and external factors (from a biopsychosocial point of view) associated to a better empathic relation with health professionals in a multicenter cohort obtained from a population basis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The multicenter cohort was obtained from four basic health zones, 3 urban and one periurban, from the province of Seville (Southwestern Spain). Empathy was measured with the Likert scale (1-5), by means of an interview (differentiating between family doctor, family nurse and reference internist), by a member of the research team who was not related with patient's care. After that, a factorial analysis was performed, obtaining global empathy as a factor (maximum likelihood method, the summarized three variable matrix, ranging from 0.44 to 0.85). The possible predictive factors of global empathy were chosen from clinical-demographic care features of PMD. Comparisons between groups were performed with the Student's t and ANOVA tests. Correlations were with Pearson correlation quotient. Finally a multivariant analysis was done by linear regression and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Four hundred and sixty (69%) of 662 eligible PMD from the cohort answered the interview. Empathy with family doctor, family nurse and reference internist was 4.39 +/- 0.98; 4.49 +/- 0.87 and 4.48 +/- 0.48, respectively. The median of the global empathy factor was 0.33 (-4.7-1.2). Global empathy was associated to having telephone access to the family doctor (0.56 vs 0.22; p < 0.0001) and to the family nurse (0.58 vs 0.24, p = 0.05), and was inversely correlated with global Gijon scale (r -0.100; p = 0.031) and with two of its dimensions: support (r -0.145; p = 0.002), and income (r -0.167; p < 0.0001). In the multivariant analysis, social evaluation measured by the Gijon index (p = 0.001) and number of drugs prescribed (p = 0.004) independently predicted global empathy. CONCLUSION: In the PMD multicenter cohort, both empathy level with the different health professionals and global empathy were high. The latter was associated with having telephone access to the family doctor and nurse, with number of drugs prescribed and with a good social and family support status.
Authors: Juan Gómez-Salgado; Máximo Bernabeu-Wittel; Carmen Aguilera-González; Juan Antonio Goicoechea-Salazar; Daniel Larrocha; María Dolores Nieto-Martín; Lourdes Moreno-Gaviño; Manuel Ollero-Baturone Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2019-05-06 Impact factor: 4.241