Literature DB >> 1768876

Practical method for quantifying hearing aid benefit in older adults.

C W Newman1, G P Jacobson, G A Hug, B E Weinstein, R L Malinoff.   

Abstract

Self-assessment handicap scales are gaining recognition as objective measures of audiologic intervention, including benefit derived from hearing aid use. A short form of the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly (HHIE-S) comprised of 10 items (5 emotional and 5 social/situational) was administered to 91 new hearing aid users prior to and 3 weeks following hearing aid provision. A significant reduction in perceived emotional and social/situational effects of hearing impairment was observed following this brief interval of hearing aid use. The magnitude of hearing aid benefit was not affected by pure-tone sensitivity or word recognition ability. Further, a 95 percent confidence interval was established for the HHIE-S (9.3 points) in order to determine a true change in self-perceived handicap and pre- and post-hearing aid fitting for a given subject. Our findings support the use of the HHIE-S as an expedient approach for quantifying hearing aid benefit in a busy clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1768876

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  12 in total

1.  Outcome measures in the hearing aid fitting/selection process.

Authors:  B E Weinstein
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  1997-12

2.  The Baltimore HEARS Pilot Study: An Affordable, Accessible, Community-Delivered Hearing Care Intervention.

Authors:  Carrie L Nieman; Nicole Marrone; Sara K Mamo; Joshua Betz; Janet S Choi; Kevin J Contrera; Roland J Thorpe; Laura N Gitlin; Elizabeth K Tanner; Hae-Ra Han; Sarah L Szanton; Frank R Lin
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2017-11-10

3.  Hearing Screening in the Community.

Authors:  Gabrielle H Saunders; Melissa T Frederick; ShienPei C Silverman; Tina Penman; Austin Gardner; Theresa H Chisolm; Celia D Escabi; Preyanca H Oree; Laura C Westermann; Victoria A Sanchez; Michelle L Arnold
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 1.664

4.  Cultural Adaptation of a Community-Based Hearing Health Intervention for Korean American Older Adults with Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Janet S Choi; Kyoo S Shim; Na E Shin; Carrie L Nieman; Sara K Mamo; Hae-Ra Han; Frank R Lin
Journal:  J Cross Cult Gerontol       Date:  2019-09

5.  Unmet hearing health care needs: the Beaver Dam offspring study.

Authors:  Scott D Nash; Karen J Cruickshanks; Guan-Hua Huang; Barbara E K Klein; Ronald Klein; F Javier Nieto; Theodore S Tweed
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Healthy aging in elderly cochlear implant recipients: a multinational observational study.

Authors:  M Marx; I Mosnier; J Belmin; J Wyss; C Coudert-Koall; A Ramos; R Manrique Huarte; R Khnifes; O Hilly; A Martini; D Cuda
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 3.921

7.  Self-reported hearing loss in Russians: the population-based Ural Eye and Medical Study.

Authors:  Mukharram M Bikbov; Rinat R Fayzrakhmanov; Gyulli M Kazakbaeva; Rinat M Zainullin; Venera F Salavatova; Timur R Gilmanshin; Inga I Arslangareeva; Nikolai A Nikitin; Songhomitra Panda-Jonas; Svetlana R Mukhamadieva; Dilya F Yakupova; Renat I Khikmatullin; Said K Aminev; Ildar F Nuriev; Artur F Zaynetdinov; Yulia V Uzianbaeva; Jost B Jonas
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Hearing aid effectiveness after aural rehabilitation - individual versus group (HEARING) trial: RCT design and baseline characteristics.

Authors:  Margaret P Collins; Pamela E Souza; Chuan-Fen Liu; Patrick J Heagerty; Dagmar Amtmann; Bevan Yueh
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Validation of the Swedish Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly (Screening Version) and Evaluation of Its Effect in Hearing Aid Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Maria Öberg
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 3.293

10.  The Just-Meaningful Difference in Speech-to-Noise Ratio.

Authors:  David McShefferty; William M Whitmer; Michael A Akeroyd
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 3.293

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.