Literature DB >> 17688274

Fabrication of porous substrates: a review of processes using pore forming agents in the biomaterial field.

Emilie Chevalier1, Dominique Chulia, Christelle Pouget, Marylène Viana.   

Abstract

This paper is a review of solid and casting manufacturing processes able to create porous materials, mainly in the biomaterial field. The considered methods are based on pore forming agents that are removed either by heating or by dissolution. All techniques lead to products presenting pores with amount, size, and shape are close to those of the initial pore formers. Porosities up to 90% with pores ranging from 1 to 2000 microm are reported. Major differences concern macrointerconnections that are more frequently obtained using foams, or porogens which undergo a melting stage during firing. Casting methods combined with solid free form fabrication are promising for the design of porous network through the manufacturing of 3D scaffolds corresponding to the desired porosity. (Copyright) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 17688274     DOI: 10.1002/jps.21059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharm Sci        ISSN: 0022-3549            Impact factor:   3.534


  20 in total

Review 1.  Scaffolding in tissue engineering: general approaches and tissue-specific considerations.

Authors:  B P Chan; K W Leong
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Effect of cross-linking on the physicochemical and in vitro properties of pullulan/dextran microbeads.

Authors:  Soraya Lanouar; Rachida Aid-Launais; Ana Oliveira; Laurent Bidault; Brigitte Closs; Marie-Noëlle Labour; Didier Letourneur
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 3.  Three-dimensional scaffolds for tissue engineering applications: role of porosity and pore size.

Authors:  Qiu Li Loh; Cleo Choong
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 6.389

4.  Levofloxacin-loaded star poly(ε-caprolactone) scaffolds by additive manufacturing.

Authors:  Dario Puppi; Anna Maria Piras; Alessandro Pirosa; Stefania Sandreschi; Federica Chiellini
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 5.  Calcium Orthophosphate-Based Bioceramics.

Authors:  Sergey V Dorozhkin
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  Supercritical phase inversion of starch-poly(epsilon-caprolactone) for tissue engineering applications.

Authors:  Ana Rita C Duarte; João F Mano; Rui L Reis
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 3.896

7.  Silk as a biocohesive sacrificial binder in the fabrication of hydroxyapatite load bearing scaffolds.

Authors:  Stephanie L McNamara; Jelena Rnjak-Kovacina; Daniel F Schmidt; Tim J Lo; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Porous Shape Memory Polymers.

Authors:  Keith Hearon; Pooja Singhal; John Horn; Ward Small; Cory Olsovsky; Kristen C Maitland; Thomas S Wilson; Duncan J Maitland
Journal:  Polym Rev (Phila Pa)       Date:  2013-02-04

Review 9.  Highly porous drug-eluting structures: from wound dressings to stents and scaffolds for tissue regeneration.

Authors:  Jonathan J Elsner; Amir Kraitzer; Orly Grinberg; Meital Zilberman
Journal:  Biomatter       Date:  2012 Oct-Dec

10.  Synthesis, Characterization, and Osteoblastic Cell Culture of Poly(L-co-D,L-lactide-co-trimethylene carbonate) Scaffolds.

Authors:  André Dutra Messias; Kelly Fernanda Martins; Adriana Cristina Motta; Eliana Aparecida de Rezende Duek
Journal:  Int J Biomater       Date:  2014-06-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.