OBJECT: Spinal column metastatic disease clinically affects thousands of cancer patients every year. Local chemotherapy represents a new option in the treatment of metastatic disease of the spine. Despite the clinical impact of metastatic spine disease, the literature currently lacks an accurate animal model for the effective dosing of local chemotherapeutic agents within the vertebral column. METHODS: Female Fischer 344 rats, weighing 150 to 200 g each, were used in this study. After induction of anesthesia, a transabdominal approach to the ventral vertebral body of L-6 was performed. A small hole was drilled and 5 microL of ReGel (blank polymer), OncoGel (paclitaxel and ReGel) 1.5%, OncoGel 3.0%, or OncoGel 6.0% were immediately injected to determine drug toxicity. Based on these results, efficacy studies were performed by intratumoral injection of 5 microL of ReGel, OncoGel 3.0%, and OncoGel 6.0% on Day 6 in a CRL- 1666 breast adenocarcinoma metastatic spine tumor model. Hind limb function was tested pre- and postoperatively using the Basso-Beattie-Bresnahan rating scale. Histological analysis of the spinal cord and vertebral column was performed when the animal died or was killed. RESULTS: There were no signs of toxicity observed in association with any of the agents under study. No increased benefit was seen in the blank polymer group compared with the control group (tumor only). OncoGel 3.0% and OncoGel 6.0% were effective in delaying the onset of paralysis in the respective study groups. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate the potential benefit of OncoGel in cases of subtotal resections of metastatic spinal column tumors. OncoGel 6.0% is the most efficacious drug concentration and offers the best therapeutic option in this experimental model. These results provide promise for the development of local chemotherapeutic means to treat spinal metastases.
OBJECT: Spinal column metastatic disease clinically affects thousands of cancerpatients every year. Local chemotherapy represents a new option in the treatment of metastatic disease of the spine. Despite the clinical impact of metastatic spine disease, the literature currently lacks an accurate animal model for the effective dosing of local chemotherapeutic agents within the vertebral column. METHODS: Female Fischer 344 rats, weighing 150 to 200 g each, were used in this study. After induction of anesthesia, a transabdominal approach to the ventral vertebral body of L-6 was performed. A small hole was drilled and 5 microL of ReGel (blank polymer), OncoGel (paclitaxel and ReGel) 1.5%, OncoGel 3.0%, or OncoGel 6.0% were immediately injected to determine drug toxicity. Based on these results, efficacy studies were performed by intratumoral injection of 5 microL of ReGel, OncoGel 3.0%, and OncoGel 6.0% on Day 6 in a CRL- 1666 breast adenocarcinoma metastatic spine tumor model. Hind limb function was tested pre- and postoperatively using the Basso-Beattie-Bresnahan rating scale. Histological analysis of the spinal cord and vertebral column was performed when the animal died or was killed. RESULTS: There were no signs of toxicity observed in association with any of the agents under study. No increased benefit was seen in the blank polymer group compared with the control group (tumor only). OncoGel 3.0% and OncoGel 6.0% were effective in delaying the onset of paralysis in the respective study groups. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate the potential benefit of OncoGel in cases of subtotal resections of metastatic spinal column tumors. OncoGel 6.0% is the most efficacious drug concentration and offers the best therapeutic option in this experimental model. These results provide promise for the development of local chemotherapeutic means to treat spinal metastases.
Authors: Betty M Tyler; Alia Hdeib; Justin Caplan; Federico G Legnani; Kirk D Fowers; Henry Brem; George Jallo; Gustavo Pradilla Journal: J Neurosurg Spine Date: 2012-01
Authors: Davina A F Cossigny; Effie Mouhtouris; Sathana Dushyanthen; Augusto Gonzalvo; Gerald M Y Quan Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2013-08-18 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Lin Wang; Shayan Rahman; Chia-Ying Lin; Juan Valdivia; Khoi Than; Frank La Marca; Paul Park Journal: J Clin Neurosci Date: 2012-04-18 Impact factor: 1.961
Authors: Cheryl V Rahman; Stuart J Smith; Paul S Morgan; Keith A Langmack; Phil A Clarke; Alison A Ritchie; Donald C Macarthur; Felicity R Rose; Kevin M Shakesheff; Richard G Grundy Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-10-14 Impact factor: 3.240