Literature DB >> 17687668

Causes and consequences of DNA repair activity modulation during stationary phase in Escherichia coli.

Claude Saint-Ruf1, Josipa Pesut, Mary Sopta, Ivan Matic.   

Abstract

Escherichia coli responds to nutrient exhaustion by entering a state commonly referred to as the stationary phase. Cells entering the stationary phase redirect metabolic circuits to scavenge any available nutrients and become resistant to different stresses. However, many DNA repair pathways are downregulated in stationary-phase cells, which results in increased mutation rates. DNA repair activity generally depends on consumption of energy and often requires de novo proteins synthesis. Consequently, unless stringently regulated during stationary phase, DNA repair activities may lead to an irreversible depletion of energy sources and, therefore to cell death. Most stationary phase morphological and physiological modifications are regulated by an alternative RNA polymerase sigma factor RpoS. However, nutrient availability, and the frequency and nature of stresses, are different in distinct environmental niches, which impose conflicting choices that result in selection of the loss or of the modification of RpoS function. Consequently, DNA repair activity, which is partially controlled by RpoS, is differently modulated in different environments. This results in the variable mutation rates among different E. coli ecotypes. Hence, the polymorphism of mutation rates in natural E. coli populations can be viewed as a byproduct of the selection for improved fitness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17687668     DOI: 10.1080/10409230701495599

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol        ISSN: 1040-9238            Impact factor:   8.250


  19 in total

1.  Polyphosphate granule biogenesis is temporally and functionally tied to cell cycle exit during starvation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Lisa R Racki; Elitza I Tocheva; Michael G Dieterle; Meaghan C Sullivan; Grant J Jensen; Dianne K Newman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  The take and give between retrotransposable elements and their hosts.

Authors:  Arthur Beauregard; M Joan Curcio; Marlene Belfort
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 16.830

Review 3.  Culture history and population heterogeneity as determinants of bacterial adaptation: the adaptomics of a single environmental transition.

Authors:  Ben Ryall; Gustavo Eydallin; Thomas Ferenci
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 11.056

Review 4.  Evaluating evolutionary models of stress-induced mutagenesis in bacteria.

Authors:  R Craig MacLean; Clara Torres-Barceló; Richard Moxon
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 53.242

5.  Lag phase is a distinct growth phase that prepares bacteria for exponential growth and involves transient metal accumulation.

Authors:  Matthew D Rolfe; Christopher J Rice; Sacha Lucchini; Carmen Pin; Arthur Thompson; Andrew D S Cameron; Mark Alston; Michael F Stringer; Roy P Betts; József Baranyi; Michael W Peck; Jay C D Hinton
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 6.  Lag Phase Is a Dynamic, Organized, Adaptive, and Evolvable Period That Prepares Bacteria for Cell Division.

Authors:  Robert L Bertrand
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Oxidation of dCTP contributes to antibiotic lethality in stationary-phase mycobacteria.

Authors:  Xiao-Yong Fan; Bi-Kui Tang; Yuan-Yuan Xu; Ang-Xuan Han; Kun-Xiong Shi; Yong-Kai Wu; Yu Ye; Mei-Li Wei; Chen Niu; Ka-Wing Wong; Guo-Ping Zhao; Liang-Dong Lyu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Use of whole genome sequencing to estimate the mutation rate of Mycobacterium tuberculosis during latent infection.

Authors:  Christopher B Ford; Philana Ling Lin; Michael R Chase; Rupal R Shah; Oleg Iartchouk; James Galagan; Nilofar Mohaideen; Thomas R Ioerger; James C Sacchettini; Marc Lipsitch; JoAnne L Flynn; Sarah M Fortune
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2011-04-24       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  Atypical Role for PhoU in Mutagenic Break Repair under Stress in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Janet L Gibson; Mary-Jane Lombardo; Ildiko Aponyi; Diana Vera Cruz; Mellanie P Ray; Susan M Rosenberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Nucleoid-associated proteins affect mutation dynamics in E. coli in a growth phase-specific manner.

Authors:  Tobias Warnecke; Fran Supek; Ben Lehner
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.