Literature DB >> 17687648

Phase II, randomized trial of preoperative epirubicin-paclitaxel +/- gefitinib with biomarker evaluation in operable breast cancer.

Valentina Guarneri1, Antonio Frassoldati, Guido Ficarra, Fabio Puglisi, Claudia Andreetta, Andrea Michelotti, Nicola Cresti, Corrado Boni, Giancarlo Bisagni, Rossana Berardi, Nicola Battelli, Armando Santoro, Giuseppe Banna, Alberto Bottini, Beatrice Di Blasio, Antonino Maiorana, Federico Piacentini, Simona Giovannelli, Gordana Jovic, PierFranco Conte.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the in vivo effect of adding gefitinib to preoperative chemotherapy on the EGFR-dependent p42/44 MAPK in operable breast cancer (BC) patients. Secondary aims: to evaluate EGFR, (p)-EGFR, Ki67, apoptotic index (TUNEL test) and VEGFR2 expression from baseline to surgery, percentage of pathologic complete response (pCR), and toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 90 patients with stage II-IIIA BC have been randomized to receive epirubicin 90 mg/sqm and paclitaxel 175 mg/sqm on day 1 plus: gefitinib 250 mg daily from day 5 to 16 (Arm A, intermittent), gefitinib 250 mg daily from day 1 to 21 (Arm B, continuous), or placebo (Arm C). Treatment plan: 4 courses every 3 weeks, followed by surgery.
RESULTS: After preoperative therapy, 86/90 patients underwent surgery; 46 patients (51%) received breast conservative surgery. A pCR was observed in 4 patients. No significant differences in the expression of p42/44 MAPK, EGFR, (p)-EGFR, VEGFR2, proliferation index and apoptosis were observed comparing the combined Arms A + B vs C, and comparing Arm A vs B. Hematologic toxicities were not significantly different comparing Arms A + B vs Arm C, and comparing Arm A vs B. Significantly higher skin and mucosal toxicities were observed when comparing the two gefitinib Arms (A + B) vs Arm C (32% vs 9.6%, P = 0.018; 57% vs 29%, P = 0.009 respectively), while no significant differences were observed comparing Arm A vs B.
CONCLUSION: Adding gefitinib to chemotherapy did not result in different effects on the EGFR-dependent pathway, proliferation, apoptosis and VEGFR2 expression as compared to placebo, while enhancing skin and mucosal toxicity. The two schedules of gefitinib (intermittent vs continuous) did not result in different biologic effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17687648     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-007-9688-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  5 in total

Review 1.  The risk for anemia with targeted therapies for solid tumors.

Authors:  Sandro Barni; Mary Cabiddu; Paolo Guarneri; Veronica Lonati; Fausto Petrelli
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2012-04-24

Review 2.  Efficacy and mechanism of action of the tyrosine kinase inhibitors gefitinib, lapatinib and neratinib in the treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer: preclinical and clinical evidence.

Authors:  Mariana Segovia-Mendoza; María E González-González; David Barrera; Lorenza Díaz; Rocío García-Becerra
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 6.166

Review 3.  Relapsed triple-negative breast cancer: challenges and treatment strategies.

Authors:  Valentina Guarneri; Maria Vittoria Dieci; Pierfranco Conte
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Role for the epidermal growth factor receptor in chemotherapy-induced alopecia.

Authors:  Kyle J Bichsel; Navdeep Gogia; Timothy Malouff; Zachary Pena; Eric Forney; Brianna Hammiller; Patrice Watson; Laura A Hansen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The efficacy of gefitinib supplementation for breast cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.

Authors:  Jing Ye; Tian Tian; Xiaopin Chen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 1.817

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.