Literature DB >> 17686893

Evaluation of fermentable oligosaccharides in diets fed to dogs in comparison to fiber standards.

I S Middelbos1, N D Fastinger, G C Fahey.   

Abstract

Blends of fermentable oligosaccharides in combination with nonfermentable fiber, cellulose, were evaluated for their ability to serve as dietary fibers in dog foods. Using a 6 x 6 Latin square design, 6 diets were evaluated that contained either no supplemental fiber, beet pulp, cellulose, or blends of cellulose, fructooligosaccharides, and yeast cell wall added at 2.5% of the diet. Six ileal-cannulated dogs were fed 175 g of their assigned diet twice daily. Chromic oxide served as a digestibility marker. Nutrient digestibility, fecal microbial populations, fermentative end products, and immunological indices were measured. Total tract DM and OM digestibilities were lowest (P < 0.05) for the cellulose treatment. Crude protein digestibility was lower (P < 0.05) for the treatments containing carbohydrate blends. The cellulose treatment had the lowest (P < 0.05) concentration of bacteria, and all diets containing fermentable fiber had greater (P < 0.05) fecal bifidobacteria concentrations compared with the diets without supplemental fermentable fiber. Lactobacilli concentrations tended to be greater (P < 0.08) in treatments containing fermentable fiber compared with the cellulose treatment. Bifidobacteria and lactobacilli concentrations were similar for the beet pulp treatment compared with the fermentable oligosaccharide blends. Total fecal short-chain fatty acid concentration was greater for the beet pulp treatment (P < 0.05) compared with the control and cellulose treatments. The treatments containing fermentable fiber had greater (P < 0.05) fecal butyrate concentrations compared with cellulose and control treatments. Immune indices were not affected by treatment. Our results suggest that dog foods containing blends of fermentable and nonfermentable carbohydrates produce similar physiological results as dog food containing beet pulp as a fiber source. Therefore, blends of these carbohydrates could be useful substitutes for beet pulp in dog foods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17686893     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2007-0080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  22 in total

1.  Effects of Brewer's spent grain and carrot pomace on digestibility, fecal microbiota, and fecal and urinary metabolites in dogs fed low- or high-protein diets1.

Authors:  Laura Eisenhauer; Wilfried Vahjen; Temesgen Dadi; Barbara Kohn; Jürgen Zentek
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Altered fecal microbiota, IgA, and fermentative end-products in adult dogs fed prebiotics and a nonviable Lactobacillus acidophilus.

Authors:  Matthew R Panasevich; Leighann Daristotle; Rebecca Quesnell; Gregory A Reinhart; Nolan Z Frantz
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Effects of high inclusion of soybean hulls on apparent total tract macronutrient digestibility, fecal quality, and fecal fermentative end-product concentrations in extruded diets of adult dogs.

Authors:  Katelyn B Detweiler; Fei He; Heather F Mangian; Gary M Davenport; Maria R C de Godoy
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Nutrient digestibility and fecal characteristics, microbiota, and metabolites in dogs fed human-grade foods.

Authors:  Sungho Do; Thunyaporn Phungviwatnikul; Maria R C de Godoy; Kelly S Swanson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Graded dietary resistant starch concentrations on apparent total tract macronutrient digestibility and fecal fermentative end products and microbial populations of healthy adult dogs.

Authors:  Alison N Beloshapka; Tzu-Wen L Cross; Kelly S Swanson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Functional properties of miscanthus fiber and prebiotic blends in extruded canine diets.

Authors:  Shannon Finet; Fei He; Lindsay V Clark; Maria Regina Cattai de Godoy
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.338

7.  The response of canine faecal microbiota to increased dietary protein is influenced by body condition.

Authors:  Jia Xu; Adronie Verbrugghe; Marta Lourenço; An Cools; Daisy J X Liu; Tom Van de Wiele; Massimo Marzorati; Venessa Eeckhaut; Filip Van Immerseel; Lynn Vanhaecke; Miguel Campos; Myriam Hesta
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 2.741

Review 8.  Alternative dietary fiber sources in companion animal nutrition.

Authors:  Maria R C de Godoy; Katherine R Kerr; George C Fahey
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 5.717

9.  In vitro influence of dietary protein and fructooligosaccharides on metabolism of canine fecal microbiota.

Authors:  Carlo Pinna; Carla Giuditta Vecchiato; Giuliano Zaghini; Monica Grandi; Eleonora Nannoni; Claudio Stefanelli; Giacomo Biagi
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2016-03-12       Impact factor: 2.741

10.  Influence of dietary protein and fructooligosaccharides on fecal fermentative end-products, fecal bacterial populations and apparent total tract digestibility in dogs.

Authors:  Carlo Pinna; Carla Giuditta Vecchiato; Carmen Bolduan; Monica Grandi; Claudio Stefanelli; Wilhelm Windisch; Giuliano Zaghini; Giacomo Biagi
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 2.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.