Literature DB >> 17686753

'Megapclicks': acoustic click trains and buzzes produced during night-time foraging of humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae).

Alison K Stimpert1, David N Wiley, Whitlow W L Au, Mark P Johnson, Roland Arsenault.   

Abstract

Humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) exhibit a variety of foraging behaviours, but neither they nor any baleen whale are known to produce broadband clicks in association with feeding, as do many odontocetes. We recorded underwater behaviour of humpback whales in a northwest Atlantic feeding area using suction-cup attached, multi-sensor, acoustic tags (DTAGs). Here we describe the first recordings of click production associated with underwater lunges from baleen whales. Recordings of over 34000 'megapclicks' from two whales indicated relatively low received levels at the tag (between 143 and 154dB re 1 microPa pp), most energy below 2kHz, and interclick intervals often decreasing towards the end of click trains to form a buzz. All clicks were recorded during night-time hours. Sharp body rolls also occurred at the end of click bouts containing buzzes, suggesting feeding events. This acoustic behaviour seems to form part of a night-time feeding tactic for humpbacks and also expands the known acoustic repertoire of baleen whales in general.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17686753      PMCID: PMC2391189          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2007.0281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  6 in total

Review 1.  Why pinnipeds don't echolocate.

Authors:  R J Schusterman; D Kastak; D H Levenson; C J Reichmuth; B L Southall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Testing the odontocete acoustic prey debilitation hypothesis: no stunning results.

Authors:  Kelly J Benoit-Bird; Whitlow W L Au; Ronald Kastelein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Beaked whales echolocate on prey.

Authors:  Mark Johnson; Peter T Madsen; Walter M X Zimmer; Natacha Aguilar de Soto; Peter L Tyack
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Sperm whale behaviour indicates the use of echolocation click buzzes "creaks" in prey capture.

Authors:  Patrick J O Miller; Mark P Johnson; Peter L Tyack
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Sounds, source levels, and associated behavior of humpback whales, southeast Alaska.

Authors:  P O Thompson; W C Cummings; S J Ha
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Songs of humpback whales.

Authors:  R S Payne; S McVay
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-08-13       Impact factor: 47.728

  6 in total
  18 in total

1.  Anatomical evidence for low frequency sensitivity in an archaeocete whale: comparison of the inner ear of Zygorhiza kochii with that of crown Mysticeti.

Authors:  Eric G Ekdale; Rachel A Racicot
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Underwater acrobatics by the world's largest predator: 360° rolling manoeuvres by lunge-feeding blue whales.

Authors:  Jeremy A Goldbogen; John Calambokidis; Ari S Friedlaender; John Francis; Stacy L DeRuiter; Alison K Stimpert; Erin Falcone; Brandon L Southall
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-02-23       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  High channel count microphone array accurately and precisely localizes ultrasonic signals from freely-moving mice.

Authors:  Megan R Warren; Daniel T Sangiamo; Joshua P Neunuebel
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 2.390

4.  Structure and possible functions of constant-frequency calls in Ariopsis seemanni (Osteichthyes, Ariidae).

Authors:  Daniel Schmidtke; Jochen Schulz; Jörg Hartung; Karl-Heinz Esser
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  A path reconstruction method integrating dead-reckoning and position fixes applied to humpback whales.

Authors:  Paul J Wensveen; Len Thomas; Patrick J O Miller
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 3.600

6.  Formal comment to Gong et al.: Ecosystem scale acoustic sensing reveals humpback whale behavior synchronous with herring spawning processes and re-evaluation finds no effect of sonar on humpback song occurrence in the Gulf of Maine in fall 2006.

Authors:  Denise Risch; Peter J Corkeron; William T Ellison; Sofie M Van Parijs
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Evidence for acoustic communication among bottom foraging humpback whales.

Authors:  Susan E Parks; Dana A Cusano; Alison K Stimpert; Mason T Weinrich; Ari S Friedlaender; David N Wiley
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Food talk: 40-Hz fin whale calls are associated with prey biomass.

Authors:  Miriam Romagosa; Sergi Pérez-Jorge; Irma Cascão; Helena Mouriño; Patrick Lehodey; Andreia Pereira; Tiago A Marques; Luís Matias; Mónica A Silva
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Density can be misleading for low-density species: benefits of passive acoustic monitoring.

Authors:  Tracey L Rogers; Michaela B Ciaglia; Holger Klinck; Colin Southwell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Ecosystem scale acoustic sensing reveals humpback whale behavior synchronous with herring spawning processes and re-evaluation finds no effect of sonar on humpback song occurrence in the Gulf of Maine in fall 2006.

Authors:  Zheng Gong; Ankita D Jain; Duong Tran; Dong Hoon Yi; Fan Wu; Alexander Zorn; Purnima Ratilal; Nicholas C Makris
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.