Literature DB >> 17686568

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor facilitates the angiogenesis induced by ultrasonic microbubble destruction.

Yuichi Miyake1, Koji Ohmori, Junji Yoshida, Makoto Ishizawa, Mizuki Mizukawa, Kazushi Yukiiri, Masakazu Kohno.   

Abstract

Ultrasonic destruction of microbubbles (US/MB) in the microcirculation causes local inflammatory cell infiltration, which has been shown to induce angiogenesis. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), which mobilizes myelomonocytic cells from the bone marrow and enhances vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) release from these cells, has also been applied to therapeutic angiogenesis induction. In the present study, we sought to examine the potential of G-CSF pretreatment to enhance the angiogenic effect of US/MB. Ischemic hindlimbs in mice were treated with either a predetermined minimal effective dose (300 mug/kg) of G-CSF, US/MB alone or G-CSF pretreatment followed by US/MB at seven days after removal of the femoral artery. Ultrasonic destruction of microbubbles was performed as intermittent pulsed local insonation using a diagnostic ultrasound scanner at a peak negative pressure of 1.4 MPa after intravenous injection of perfluorocarbon microbubbles. At 21 days after the treatment, we quantified the surface vascularity using a grid method and the capillary density using an alkaline phosphatase stain. Relative to the capillary density in normal muscle, the capillary density in the treated limbs was restored to 74 +/- 13% by G-CSF alone and 90 +/- 20% by US/MB alone (p < 0.05 vs. both untreated and G-CSF alone), and further increased to 101 +/- 21% by G-CSF pretreatment. The collateral growth induced by the combination of G-CSF pretreatment and US/MB was 2.8- and 1.4-fold greater than the growth induced by G-CSF alone and US/MB alone, respectively (p < 0.05 for both). Thus, pretreatment with a single minimal effective dose of G-CSF can augment the angiogenic effect of US/MB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17686568     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2007.05.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  7 in total

Review 1.  Microbubbles in ultrasound-triggered drug and gene delivery.

Authors:  Sophie Hernot; Alexander L Klibanov
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2008-04-03       Impact factor: 15.470

2.  Ultrasound contrast agents affect the angiogenic response.

Authors:  Chenara A Johnson; Rita J Miller; William D O'Brien
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.153

3.  A temporal study of ultrasound contrast agent-induced changes in capillary density.

Authors:  Chenara A Johnson; Sandhya Sarwate; Rita J Miller; William D O'Brien
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.153

4.  A visible, targeted high-efficiency gene delivery and transfection strategy.

Authors:  Qiao-Ying Yuan; Jing Huang; Bao-Cheng Chu; Xing-Sheng Li; Liang-Yi Si
Journal:  BMC Biotechnol       Date:  2011-05-21       Impact factor: 2.563

Review 5.  Ultrasound biomicroscopy in small animal research: applications in molecular and preclinical imaging.

Authors:  A Greco; M Mancini; S Gargiulo; M Gramanzini; P P Claudio; A Brunetti; M Salvatore
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2011-10-25

Review 6.  Applications of Ultrasound to Stimulate Therapeutic Revascularization.

Authors:  Catherine M Gorick; John C Chappell; Richard J Price
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  The angiogenic response is dependent on ultrasound contrast agent concentration.

Authors:  Chenara A Johnson; William D O'Brien
Journal:  Vasc Cell       Date:  2012-05-15
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.