Ahmed Badawy1, Abeer Mosbah2, Magda Shady3. 1. Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt. Electronic address: ambadawy@yahoo.com. 2. Department of Clinical Pathology, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt. 3. Department of Radiology, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of letrozole (2.5 mg) and anastrozole (1 mg) meant for ovulation induction in clomiphene (CC)-resistant women with PCOS. DESIGN: Prospective randomized trial. SETTING:University teaching hospital and private practice setting. PATIENT(S): The study comprised a total of 220 infertile women (574 cycles) with CC-resistant PCOS. INTERVENTION(S): Patients were randomized to treatment with 2.5 mg of letrozole daily (111 patients, 295 cycles) or 1 mg of anastrozole daily (109 patients, 279 cycles) for 5 days from day 3 of menses. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Number of follicles, serum E(2), serum P, endometrial thickness, pregnancy rate (PR), and miscarriage rate. RESULT(S): The total number of follicles was significantly more in the anastrozole group (5.4 +/- 0.4 vs. 5.8 +/- 0.4). The number of follicles > or = 14 mm (3.1 +/- 0.3 vs. 2.7 +/- 0.2) and > or = 18 mm (2.3 +/- 0.1 vs. 3.1 +/- 0.2) were significantly higher in the anastrozole group. The endometrial thickness at the time of hCG administration was significantly more in the anastrozole group (9.1 +/- 0.2 vs. 10.2 +/- 0.7 mm). The duration to reach a dominant follicle was longer in the letrozole group (12.1 +/- 1.3 days vs. 8.8 +/- 1.9 days) but without statistical significant difference. Ovulation occurred in 183/295 cycles (62%) in the letrozole group and 177/279 cycles (63.4%) in the anastrozole group, whereas pregnancy occurred in 36/295 cycles (12.2%) in the letrozole group and 42/279 cycles (15.1%) in the anastrozole group and the differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION(S): The results of this study did not show a significant difference in PR or miscarriage rate between anastrozole and letrozole when used for ovulation induction in women with CC-resistant PCOS.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of letrozole (2.5 mg) and anastrozole (1 mg) meant for ovulation induction in clomiphene (CC)-resistant women with PCOS. DESIGN: Prospective randomized trial. SETTING: University teaching hospital and private practice setting. PATIENT(S): The study comprised a total of 220 infertile women (574 cycles) with CC-resistant PCOS. INTERVENTION(S): Patients were randomized to treatment with 2.5 mg of letrozole daily (111 patients, 295 cycles) or 1 mg of anastrozole daily (109 patients, 279 cycles) for 5 days from day 3 of menses. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Number of follicles, serum E(2), serum P, endometrial thickness, pregnancy rate (PR), and miscarriage rate. RESULT(S): The total number of follicles was significantly more in the anastrozole group (5.4 +/- 0.4 vs. 5.8 +/- 0.4). The number of follicles > or = 14 mm (3.1 +/- 0.3 vs. 2.7 +/- 0.2) and > or = 18 mm (2.3 +/- 0.1 vs. 3.1 +/- 0.2) were significantly higher in the anastrozole group. The endometrial thickness at the time of hCG administration was significantly more in the anastrozole group (9.1 +/- 0.2 vs. 10.2 +/- 0.7 mm). The duration to reach a dominant follicle was longer in the letrozole group (12.1 +/- 1.3 days vs. 8.8 +/- 1.9 days) but without statistical significant difference. Ovulation occurred in 183/295 cycles (62%) in the letrozole group and 177/279 cycles (63.4%) in the anastrozole group, whereas pregnancy occurred in 36/295 cycles (12.2%) in the letrozole group and 42/279 cycles (15.1%) in the anastrozole group and the differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION(S): The results of this study did not show a significant difference in PR or miscarriage rate between anastrozole and letrozole when used for ovulation induction in women with CC-resistant PCOS.
Authors: Richard S Legro; Allen R Kunselman; Robert G Brzyski; Peter R Casson; Michael P Diamond; William D Schlaff; Gregory M Christman; Christos Coutifaris; Hugh S Taylor; Esther Eisenberg; Nanette Santoro; Heping Zhang Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2012-01-13 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Bich Ngoc Bui; Sarah F Lensen; Ahmed Gibreel; Wellington P Martins; Helen Torrance; Frank J Broekmans Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2021-03-18