Literature DB >> 17686261

[Hemodynamic changes during head-up tilt test and predictive value thereof in predicting the efficacy of metoprolol therapy in children with vasovagal syncope].

Qing-you Zhang1, Jun-bao DU, Jing-lan Zhen, Wan-zhen Li, Yu-li Wang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the value of hemodynamic changes during head-up tilt (HUT) test and predictive value thereof in evaluating the efficacy of metoprolol therapy in children with vasovagal syncope (VSS).
METHODS: Twenty-six consecutive children with history of VSS diagnosed by head-up tilt (HUT) or sublingual nitroglycerin potentiated head-up tilt (SNHUT), who were treated with metoprolol for 6 approximately 12 months and followed up for (18 +/- 9) months (12 approximately 36 months), were divided into two groups according to effect of metoprolol: effective treatment group (n = 16, aged 12 +/- 2) without VSS recurrence during treatment and fellow-up, and futile treatment group (n = 10, aged 12 +/- 3). The heart rate changes during HUT or SNHUT were evaluated between the two groups.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences between these 2 groups with regard to the demographic and clinical characteristics including age, gender, history, syncope spells, follow-up time and heart rate, mean blood pressure in supine position and during positive response. For example, the baseline heart rate of the effective treatment group was 81 +/- 12 beats/min, not significantly different from that of the futile treatment group (78 +/- 8 beats/min, P = 0.804). However, during tilt test 16 of the 26 patients in the effective treatment group showed tachycardia before positive response, with the mean heart rate of (123 +/- 15) beats/min, whereas all 10 patients in the futile group did not have tachycardia before positive response, with the mean heart rate of (96 +/- 17) beats/min. If an increase of 30 beats/min was taken as a borderline in heart rate during positive response in HUT compared with that of baseline value, in respect of predicting the metoprolol efficacy in the treatment of VVS, the sensitivity was 81% (13/16), the specificity was 80% (8/10), and the diagnostic value was 81% (21/26).
CONCLUSION: A marked increase in heart rate in HUT or SNHUT is a better predictor of metoprolol efficacy in the treatment of children with VVS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17686261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi        ISSN: 0376-2491


  6 in total

Review 1.  Pathophysiology and Individualized Management of Vasovagal Syncope and Postural Tachycardia Syndrome in Children and Adolescents: An Update.

Authors:  Ying Liao; Junbao Du
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 5.203

2.  Can pediatric vasovagal syncope be individually managed?

Authors:  Wen-Rui Xu; Jun-Bao Du; Hong-Fang Jin
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 2.764

3.  Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and Fractional Shortening are Useful for the Prediction of the Therapeutic Response to Metoprolol in Children with Vasovagal Syncope.

Authors:  Jingyuan Song; Hongxia Li; Yuli Wang; Ping Liu; Xueying Li; Chaoshu Tang; Hongfang Jin; Junbao Du
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 1.655

4.  Poincaré Plot Can Be a Useful Tool to Select Potential Responders to Metoprolol Therapy in Children with Vasovagal Syncope.

Authors:  Piaoliu Yuan; Xueying Li; Chunyan Tao; Xiaojuan Du; Chunyu Zhang; Junbao Du; Yaqian Huang; Ying Liao
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2022-03-08

Review 5.  Research progress on the predictive value of electrocardiographic indicators in the diagnosis and prognosis of children with vasovagal syncope.

Authors:  Ting Zhao; Shuo Wang; Miao Wang; Hong Cai; Yuwen Wang; Yi Xu; Runmei Zou; Cheng Wang
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-07-22

Review 6.  Biomarkers and Hemodynamic Parameters in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Children with Postural Tachycardia Syndrome and Vasovagal Syncope.

Authors:  Wenjie Cheng; Jiaqi Wang; Jing Lin
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 4.614

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.