Literature DB >> 17685688

Effects of velocity-specific training on rate of velocity development, peak torque, and performance.

Daniel P Murray1, Lee E Brown, Steven M Zinder, Guillermo J Noffal, Sagir G Bera, Nikki M Garrett.   

Abstract

Little is known about the velocity-specific adaptations to training utilizing movement velocities in excess of 300 degrees x s(-1). The purpose of this investigation was to determine the effects of 4 weeks of slow (60 degrees x s(-1)) vs. fast (400 degrees x s(-1)) velocity training on rate of velocity development (RVD), peak torque (PT), and performance. Twenty male kinesiology students (22.0 years +/- 2.72; 178.6 cm +/- 7.1; 82.7 kg +/- 15.5) were tested, before and after 4 weeks of training, for PT production, RVD (at 60, 180, 300, 400, and 450 degrees x s(-1)), standing long jump (SLJ) distance, and 15- and 40-m sprint times. All participants underwent 8 training sessions, performing 5 sets of 5 repetitions of simultaneous, bilateral, concentric knee extension exercises on a Biodex System 3 isokinetic dynamometer at either 60 degrees or 400 degrees per second. Two 5 (speed) x 2 (time) x 2 (group) multivariate repeated measures analyses of variance revealed no significant differences between groups on any measure. Therefore, the groups were collapsed for analysis. There was a significant (p < 0.05) main effect for RVD by time and SLJ distance by time (pre- 227.1 cm +/- 21.2; post- 232.9 cm +/- 20.7) but no significant change in PT or 15- or 40-m sprint times. These results offer support for the suggestion that there is a significant neural adaptation to short-term isokinetic training performed by recreationally trained males, producing changes in limb acceleration and performance with little or no change in strength. Because results were independent of training velocity, it appears as though the intention to move quickly is sufficient stimulus to achieve improvements in limb RVD. Changes in SLJ distance suggest that open kinetic chain training may benefit the performance of a closed kinetic chain activity when movement pattern specificity is optimized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17685688     DOI: 10.1519/R-19635.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  8 in total

1.  Knee extension rate of velocity development affects walking performance differently in men and women.

Authors:  Yusuke Osawa; Stephanie A Studenski; Luigi Ferrucci
Journal:  Exp Gerontol       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 4.032

2.  Neuromuscular adaptations to 8-week strength training: isotonic versus isokinetic mode.

Authors:  Anthony Remaud; Christophe Cornu; Arnaud Guével
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 3.  Repeated-sprint ability - part II: recommendations for training.

Authors:  David Bishop; Olivier Girard; Alberto Mendez-Villanueva
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  The Effects of Multiple-Joint Isokinetic Resistance Training on Maximal Isokinetic and Dynamic Muscle Strength and Local Muscular Endurance.

Authors:  Nicholas A Ratamess; Noah A Beller; Adam M Gonzalez; Gregory E Spatz; Jay R Hoffman; Ryan E Ross; Avery D Faigenbaum; Jie Kang
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 2.988

5.  Comparison of fatigue responses and rapid force characteristics between explosive- and traditional-resistance-trained males.

Authors:  Cameron S Mackey; Ryan M Thiele; Eric C Conchola; Jason M DeFreitas
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Muscular fatigue in response to different modalities of CrossFit sessions.

Authors:  José Luis Maté-Muñoz; Juan H Lougedo; Manuel Barba; Pablo García-Fernández; Manuel V Garnacho-Castaño; Raúl Domínguez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Short-term isokinetic training versus isotonic training: effects on asymmetry in strength of thigh muscles.

Authors:  Dragana Golik-Peric; Miodrag Drapsin; Borislav Obradovic; Patrik Drid
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2011-12-25       Impact factor: 2.193

8.  Field-Based and Lab-Based Assisted Jumping: Unveiling the Testing and Training Implications.

Authors:  James J Tufano; Jan Malecek; Michal Steffl; Petr Stastny; Vladimir Hojka; Tomas Vetrovsky
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 4.566

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.