Literature DB >> 17683815

A meta-analysis quantifying transmission parameters of FMDV strain O Taiwan among non-vaccinated and vaccinated pigs.

P L Eblé1, A A de Koeijer, M C M de Jong, B Engel, A Dekker.   

Abstract

Our aim was to provide additional estimates of main parameters for the transmission of foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) strain O Taiwan (3/97). We used the data of previous experiments in non-vaccinated and vaccinated pigs and combined the data of experiments with the same treatment(s). First, we quantified the reproduction ratio R for the various groups using a final-size method. Our final-size results predicted that vaccination with a four-fold vaccine dose (but not with a single dose) at 1 week before inoculation (-7 dpi) would reduce R compared to the non-vaccinated group. Secondly, we used the daily results of virus excretion to quantify the transmission rate beta (by using generalized linear modelling), and the infectious period T (by using survival analysis). We used the estimates of beta and T to estimate R more precisely as compared to the final-size method and also for the groups for which a finite estimate could not be obtained using a final-size method. Our modelling results predicted that beta for non-vaccinated, for single-dose and four-fold-dose groups would be 6.1 (3.7, 10)day(-1), 2.0 (1.0, 4.0)day(-1) and 0.4 (0.1, 1.4)day(-1), T at 6.5 (5.7, 7.3), 5.3 (4.7, 6.0) and 2.3 (0.9, 5.7) days and R at 40 (21, 74), 11 (4.9, 24) and 1.0 (0.1, 7.8), respectively. These results predicted that both vaccination with a four-fold vaccine dose and with a single dose at -7 dpi would reduce beta, T and R significantly as compared to the non-vaccinated pigs, thereby showing that vaccination will reduce transmission of FMDV significantly already 1 week post vaccination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17683815     DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2007.06.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Vet Med        ISSN: 0167-5877            Impact factor:   2.670


  7 in total

1.  Estimating the Basic Reproductive Number (R0) for African Swine Fever Virus (ASFV) Transmission between Pig Herds in Uganda.

Authors:  Mike B Barongo; Karl Ståhl; Bernard Bett; Richard P Bishop; Eric M Fèvre; Tony Aliro; Edward Okoth; Charles Masembe; Darryn Knobel; Amos Ssematimba
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Quantification of transmission of foot-and-mouth disease virus caused by an environment contaminated with secretions and excretions from infected calves.

Authors:  Carla Bravo de Rueda; Mart C M de Jong; Phaedra L Eblé; Aldo Dekker
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 3.683

3.  Quantitative impacts of incubation phase transmission of foot-and-mouth disease virus.

Authors:  Jonathan Arzt; Matthew A Branan; Amy H Delgado; Shankar Yadav; Karla I Moreno-Torres; Michael J Tildesley; Carolina Stenfeldt
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  African Swine Fever: Fast and Furious or Slow and Steady?

Authors:  Katja Schulz; Franz Josef Conraths; Sandra Blome; Christoph Staubach; Carola Sauter-Louis
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 5.048

5.  Mathematical Quantification of Transmission in Experiments: FMDV Transmission in Pigs Can Be Blocked by Vaccination and Separation.

Authors:  Aldo Dekker; Herman J W van Roermund; Thomas J Hagenaars; Phaedra L Eblé; Mart C M de Jong
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-11-20

Review 6.  Experimental evaluation of foot-and-mouth disease vaccines for emergency use in ruminants and pigs: a review.

Authors:  Sarah J Cox; Paul V Barnett
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 3.683

Review 7.  Review: Livestock disease resilience: from individual to herd level.

Authors:  A Doeschl-Wilson; P W Knap; T Opriessnig; S J More
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2021-07-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.