Literature DB >> 17683684

[Evaluation of bioethical aspects in health professionals].

Jaime Zabala-Blanco1, Ana Rosa Alconero-Camarero, María Casaus-Pérez, Elena Gutiérrez-Torre, Graciela Saiz-Fernández.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate training in bioethics, as well as knowledge and perceptions of bioethical issues, among health professionals.
METHOD: A descriptive cross-sectional study was performed in 2005 by means of a validated questionnaire. The study population consisted of the health team working in the cardiology area in the Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital.
RESULTS: There were 186 health professionals, and 117 questionnaires were returned, representing 63.5% of the study population: 58 nurses (49.5%), 23 physicians (19.6%), and 34 nursing auxiliaries. More than half (64.6%) had no training in bioethics. The health professionals with the most training in bioethics were those with more than 20 years' experience (p = 0.019). Less than half (45.7%) knew of the existence (p = 0.004) or the content (p = 0.03) of law 41/2002. A total of 12.8% believed that users knew their rights. Health professionals with no bioethics training were those most likely to believe that users' confidentiality (p = 0.002) and privacy (p = 0.039) were always or usually respected. More than one third (37.8%) reported facing bioethical problems in their professional activity.
CONCLUSION: The members of the health team have insufficient knowledge of bioethics parallel to low levels of training in this discipline and perceive insufficient respect for users' basic rights. Training in bioethics should be increased, and information pathways should be established in institutions to allow continual adaptation to ethical and legal requirements.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17683684     DOI: 10.1016/s1130-8621(07)71770-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Enferm Clin        ISSN: 1130-8621


  2 in total

1.  Analysis of the ethical aspects of professional confidentiality in dental practice.

Authors:  Cléa Adas Saliba Garbin; Artênio José Isper Garbin; Nemre Adas Saliba; Daniela Coelho de Lima; Ana Paula Ayala de Macedo
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.698

2.  Opinions of nurses regarding conscientious objection.

Authors:  Rafael Toro-Flores; Pilar Bravo-Agüi; María Victoria Catalán-Gómez; Marisa González-Hernando; María Jesús Guijarro-Cenisergue; Margarita Moreno-Vázquez; Isabel Roch-Hamelin; Tamara Raquel Velasco-Sanz
Journal:  Nurs Ethics       Date:  2017-11-12       Impact factor: 2.874

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.