| Literature DB >> 17683574 |
Yongzhong Xing1, Uschi Frei, Britt Schejbel, Torben Asp, Thomas Lübberstedt.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Association analysis is an alternative way for QTL mapping in ryegrass. So far, knowledge on nucleotide diversity and linkage disequilibrium in ryegrass is lacking, which is essential for the efficiency of association analyses.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2007 PMID: 17683574 PMCID: PMC1978496 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2229-7-43
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Plant Biol ISSN: 1471-2229 Impact factor: 4.215
Summary information on allele sequences for 11 candidate genes obtained from the 20 diploid heterozygous L. perenne genotypes within the LTS
| Genes | Homologues | Fragment length (bp)a | Sequenced (bp)b | No. of haplotypes | Primers for gene fragments (5' to 3') |
| EST1 | NBS-LRR | 949 | 949 | 27 | F ctcggatccaacatggagga |
| EST6 | NBS-LRR | 936 | 932 | 27 | F gggaaagtccaaacttgacg |
| EST7 | NBS-LRR | 1036 | 1036 | 19 | F atagccttcctttggcaatc |
| EST26 | NBS-LRR | 1140 | 507 + 523 | 14 | F gctgcagctggctaacaaca |
| EST31 | NBS-LRR | 943 | 943 | 12 | F agcacgccatcactgttcta |
| EST45 | NBS-LRR | 1014 | 1056 | 23 | F gagcagccttcctccaaact |
| EST13 | EDR-1 | 2200 | 480 + 479 | 10 | F aagcggaggattaagatggc |
| EST24 | MAP-1 | 1350 | 505 + 480 | 13 | F tatatccgccaacttccccg |
| EST28 | PKPA | 1145 | 509 + 510 | 10 | F gagcaacaagactgaccatt |
| EST39 | PKPA | 1500 | 502 + 475 | 15 | F cacatcatcggattccacaa |
| EST40 | PRP-1 | 1085 | 1085 | 9 | F agaaacaggaggcgacaagt |
a Fragment length responds to largest PCR band among 20 genotypes.
b Length of fragments sequenced for all 20 LTS genotypes.
Figure 1Gene structures of 11 candidate resistance genes.
Allele frequencies and homozygosity for 11 genes based on the 20 LTS genotypes
| Allele frequencies | Homozygosity % | ||||||
| Genes | Alleles | ≤5% | >5–20% | >20–40% | >40–60% | Observed | Expected |
| EST1 | 27 | 24 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 20.0** | 4.5 |
| EST6 | 27 | 24 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 20.0** | 4.2 |
| EST7 | 19 | 13 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 40.0** | 5.4 |
| EST26 | 14 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 55.0** | 14.9 |
| EST31 | 12 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 55.0** | 18.6 |
| EST45 | 23 | 20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 60.0** | 7.9 |
| N-L averagea | 20.4 | 16.6 | 3.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | ||
| EST13 | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 45.0** | 22.8 |
| EST24 | 13 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 35.0* | 22.3 |
| EST28 | 10 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 55.0** | 33.4 |
| EST39 | 15 | 13 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 45.0** | 17.2 |
| EST40 | 9 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 75.0** | 26.0 |
| R averageb | 11.4 | 8.0 | 2.2 | 0.8 | 0.4 | ||
| Averagec | 16.3 | 12.7 | 2.8 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 45.9** | 16.1 |
*, ** significant differences between observed and expected homozygosity at the level of 5% and 1%, respectively, by Chi square test.
a N-L average: average across the 6 NBS-LRR like genes.
b R average: average across the other 5 R genes.
c Average: average across all the 11 genes.
Description of diploid heterozygous L. perenne genotypes within the Lolium Test Set (LTS)
| Code | Name | Type | Specificity | Countrya | Homozygosity (%)b |
| LTS01 | G00612 | Forage | Parent in a mapping population | NL | 36 |
| LTS02 | G00559 | Forage | Parent in a mapping population | NL | 85 |
| LTS03 | NGB9C2 | Ecotype | Parent in a mapping population | DK | 54 |
| LTS04 | Veyo9C1 | Forage | Parent in a mapping population | DK | 50 |
| LTS05 | DLF5 | Turf | Parent in a mapping population | DK | 36 |
| LTS06 | DLF6 | Turf | Parent in a mapping population | DK | 64 |
| LTS07 | G00851 | Forage | Parent in a mapping population | NL | 43 |
| LTS08 | G00852 | Forage | Parent in a mapping population | NL | 57 |
| LTS09 | RASP17-03 | Forage | RASP family self-fertility S1FS51F | UK | 64 |
| LTS10 | ILGI 80 | Forage | Selected genotype from ILGI mapping population | UK | 38 |
| LTS11 | Lp 34–551 | Turf | Colchicine induced type | LT | 57 |
| LTS12 | INRA1 | Forage | Parent in a mapping population | F | 64 |
| LTS13 | INRA2 | Forage | Parent in a mapping population | F | 38 |
| LTS14 | INRA3 | Turf | Parent in a mapping population | F | 57 |
| LTS15 | INRA4 | Ecotype | Mediterranean origin: Greece | F | 43 |
| LTS16 | INRA5 | Ecotype | Nordic origin: Sweden | F | 38 |
| LTS17 | WSC 22/9 | Forage | Selected genotype from WSC mapping population | UK | 48 |
| LTS18 | WSC 23/9 | Forage | Selected genotype from WSC mapping population | UK | 36 |
| LTS19 | ILGI P150/112 74 | Forage | Selected genotype from ILGI mapping population | UK | 29 |
| LTS20 | ILGI P150/112 166 | Forage | Selected genotype from ILGI mapping population | UK | 50 |
a NL, The Netherlands; DK, Denmark; UK, United Kingdom; LT, Lithuania; F, France.
b Percentage of homozygous loci among all the 11 genes based on the sequenced 1 kb allele sequences.
Summary of DNA polymorphism and diversity estimates in the about 1000 bp of 11 candidate genes
| Parameters | Entire region | Non-coding | Coding regions | ||
| All sites | Synonymous | Non-synonymous | |||
| 949 | 33 | 916 | |||
| Indels (sites) | 57 | 12 | 45 | ||
| SNP sites | 107 | 0 | 107 | 25 | 82 |
| Polymorphic sites in %a | 12.0 | 0 | 12.3 | 12.0 | 12.6 |
| θ/bpb | 0.0297 | 0 | 0.0301 | ||
| Tajima's Db | -0.0676ns | - | -0.0676ns | ||
| 936 | 95 | 841 | |||
| Indels (sites) | 67 | 0 | 67 | ||
| SNP sites | 247 | 17 | 230 | 71c | 137c |
| Polymorphic sites in % | 28.4 | 17.9 | 29.7 | 40.3 | 22.0 |
| θ/bp | 0.0793 | 0.0553 | 0.0829 | ||
| Tajima's D | -0.4662ns | 0.0302ns | -0.5024ns | ||
| 1036 | 0 | 1036 | |||
| Indels (sites) | 13 | 13 | |||
| SNP sites | 277 | 277 | 57c | 183c | |
| Polymorphic sites in % | 27.1 | 27.1 | 27.1 | 22.9 | |
| θ/bp | 0.0791 | 0.0791 | |||
| Tajima's D | -0.3672ns | -0.3672ns | |||
| 1030 | 0 | 1030 | |||
| Indels (sites) | 0 | 0 | |||
| SNP sites | 16 | 16 | 6 | 10 | |
| Polymorphic sites in % | 1.6 | 1.6 | 2.6 | 1.3 | |
| θ/bp | 0.00365 | 0.00365 | 0.0060 | 0.0030 | |
| Tajima's D | 0.0986ns | 0.0986ns | |||
| 943 | 0 | 943 | |||
| Indels (sites) | 0 | 0 | |||
| SNP sites | 20 | 20 | 0 | 20 | |
| Polymorphic sites in % | 2.1 | 2.1 | 0 | 2.7 | |
| θ/bp | 0.0050 | 0.0050 | 0 | 0.0064 | |
| Tajima's D | 1.1385ns | 1.1385ns | |||
| 1056 | 309 | 747 | |||
| Indels (sites) | 87 | 0 | 87 | ||
| SNP sites | 258 | 91 | 167 | 32c | 107c |
| Polymorphic sites in % | 26.6 | 29.4 | 22.4 | 21.8 | 21.7 |
| θ/bp | 0.0756 | 0.0896 | 0.0691 | ||
| Tajima's D | -0.4209ns | -0.3269ns | -0.4715ns | ||
| 959 | 326 | 633 | |||
| Indels (sites) | 9 | 5 | 4 | ||
| SNP sites | 9 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 4 |
| Polymorphic sites in % | 0.9 | 6.2 | 1.1 | 2.2 | 0.8 |
| θ/bp | 0.0022 | 0.0015 | 0.0026 | 0.0051 | 0.0020 |
| Tajima's D | 0.8068ns | 1.0927ns | 0.5250ns | ||
| 985 | 385 | 600 | |||
| Indels (sites) | 11 | 7 | 4 | ||
| SNP sites | 37 | 25 | 12 | 8 | 4 |
| Polymorphic sites in % | 3.8 | 6.6 | 2.0 | 6.1 | 0.9 |
| θ/bp | 0.0089 | 0.0160 | 0.0047 | 0.0144 | 0.0020 |
| Tajima's D | 1.1897ns | 1.1556ns | 1.0406ns | ||
| 1019 | 398 | 621 | |||
| Indels (sites) | 58 | 58 | 0 | ||
| SNP sites | 63 | 33 | 30 | 20 | 10 |
| Polymorphic sites in % | 6.6 | 9.7 | 4.8 | 14.8 | 2.1 |
| θ/bp | 0.0154 | 0.0228 | 0.0114 | 0.0347 | 0.0049 |
| Tajima's D | 0.8363ns | 1.3632ns | 0.1900ns | ||
| 977 | 257 | 720 | |||
| Indels (sites) | 28 | 23 | 5 | ||
| SNP sites | 52 | 13 | 39 | 24c | 10c |
| Polymorphic sites in % | 5.5 | 5.4 | 5.5 | 12.8 | 1.9 |
| θ/bp | 0.0130 | 0.0138 | 0.0138 | ||
| Tajima's D | 2.1562* | 0.9752ns | 2.4360* | ||
| 1085 | 371 | 712 | |||
| Indels (sites) | 2 | 0 | 2 | ||
| SNP sites | 9 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 6 |
| Polymorphic sites in % | 0.8 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 1.1 |
| θ/bp | 0.0020 | 0.0013 | 0.0023 | 0.0013 | 0.0027 |
| Tajima's D | -0.1300ns | 1.2987ns | -0.7024ns | ||
a Polymorphic sites in percentage measured as polymorphic sites in the target region divided by the total nucleotides in the region excluding indels. Synonymous (non-synonymous) polymorphic sites in percentage measured as synonymous (non-synonymous) mutation sites divided by synonymous (non-synonymous) sites.
b θ Watterson's estimator; π nucleotide diversity per site; D Tajimas's D: *, ** significant at P = 0.05 and 0.01 level; ns non-significant.
c A number of synonymous and non-synonymous mutations were not included due to some codons with multiple and complex evolutionary path.
Comparison of nucleotide diversity in different gene classes for the 20 LTS genotypes
| Genesa | SNP | θb | πc | Dd |
| N-L | 925 | 0.0464 | 0.0427 | -0.2998 |
| R | 170 | 0.0089 | 0.0062 | 1.5486 |
| All genes | 1095 | 0.0306 | 0.0314 | 0.0203 |
a NBS, R, and All genes means the merged sequence of NBS-LRR genes, non-NBS-LRR genes, and all the 11 genes, respectively, when calculation.
b θ Watterson's estimator;c π nucleotide diversity per site;d D Tajimas's D
Intragenic LD values between pairs of polymorphic sites and numbers of site pairs showing LD at P = 0.01 level within one gene
| r2 Mean ± SD | Distance r2 < 0.2a | D' Mean ± SD | No of pairwise comparisons | ||
| Genes | In LDb | Totally tested | |||
| EST1 | 0.11 ± 0.22 | 25 | -0.3929 ± 0.8585 | 696 (13.5) | 5151 |
| EST6 | 0.11 ± 0.23 | 20 | -0.4139 ± 0.8443 | 2032 (9.9) | 20503 |
| EST7 | 0.10 ± 0.22 | 20 | -0.5966 ± 0.7678 | 2251 (9.2) | 24531 |
| EST26 | 0.11 ± 0.14 | 25 | -0.4264 ± 0.8885 | 15 (12.4) | 120 |
| EST31 | 0.19 ± 0.26 | 220 | -0.1701 ± 0.8141 | 63 (33.2) | 190 |
| EST45 | 0.07 ± 0.17 | 15 | -56536 ± 0.7635 | 1666 (7.9) | 21115 |
| EST13 | 0.28 ± 0.35 | 300 | 0.02156 ± 0.9371 | 15 (41.7) | 36 |
| EST24 | 0.23 ± 0.30 | 500 | -0.4334 ± 0.8558 | 223 (33.5) | 666 |
| EST28 | 0.54 ± 0.46 | 900 (1.6) | 0.1887 ± 0.9804 | 1128 (57.8) | 1953 |
| EST39 | 0.29 ± 0.31 | 710 | -0.2859 ± 0.8581 | 635 (54.0) | 1176 |
| EST40 | 0.21 ± 0.32 | 500 | 0.1158 ± 0.9085 | 11 (30.6) | 36 |
r2 = ZnS (Kelly 1997), average of r2 over all pairwise comparisons; D' (Lewontin 1964)
a Distance in bp, but the numbers in bracket were calculated based on the function between distance and r2 in kb.
b The significant association between polymorphic pairs determined by the two-tailed Fisher's exact test. Number in bracket means the percentage, which significant pairs accounted of total pairwise comparisons.
Figure 2Plots of squared correlations of allele frequencies (r2) against distance between pairs of polymorphic sites in three genes: a) EST28, b) EST13, and c) EST1. Curves show nonlinear regression of r2 on weighted distance.