Literature DB >> 17683380

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with thin melanomas.

Roberto Cecchi1, Lauro Buralli, Stefania Innocenti, Cataldo De Gaudio.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study is to report our experience with lymphatic mapping (LM) and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in a selected group of patients with thin primary cutaneous melanomas. Fifty patients (22 females and 28 males; mean age, 57.8 years; range, 30-77 years) with a mean tumor thickness of 0.63 mm (range, 0.24-1.00 mm) underwent LM/SLNB. Twenty-eight (56%) of them had Clark level II, 20 (40%) had Clark level III, and two (4%) had Clark level IV. Tumor ulceration was present in two patients (4%) and histological regression in 35 patients (70%). Sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastases occurred in two of 50 patients (4%). The first case was a 0.88-mm thick, Clark level III, non-ulcerated superficial spreading melanoma of the trunk, without any regression. The second case was a 0.95-mm thick, Clark level IV, non-ulcerated superficial spreading melanoma of the neck, with regression. Both patients were disease-free 76 and 50 months after the SLNB procedure and followed complete lymph node dissection, respectively. The patients with negative SLN were disease-free after a median follow up of 44 months (mean, 43.2; range, 15-84 months). Published data and our experience suggest that LM/SLNB is not routinely indicated for melanomas less than 0.75 mm. Our results confirmed the accuracy of the new American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer criteria, in which SLNB is required for thin melanomas less than 1.0 mm when they have ulceration or Clark level IV and V invasion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17683380     DOI: 10.1111/j.1346-8138.2007.00323.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dermatol        ISSN: 0385-2407            Impact factor:   4.005


  6 in total

1.  Clark level risk stratifies patients with mitogenic thin melanomas for sentinel lymph node biopsy.

Authors:  Edmund K Bartlett; Phyllis A Gimotty; Andrew J Sinnamon; Heather Wachtel; Robert E Roses; Lynn Schuchter; Xiaowei Xu; David E Elder; Michael Ming; Rosalie Elenitsas; DuPont Guerry; Rachel R Kelz; Brian J Czerniecki; Douglas L Fraker; Giorgos C Karakousis
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-10-12       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Predictors of occult nodal metastasis in patients with thin melanoma.

Authors:  Mark B Faries; Leslie A Wanek; David Elashoff; Byron E Wright; Donald L Morton
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2010-02

3.  Association Between Patient Age and Lymph Node Positivity in Thin Melanoma.

Authors:  Andrew J Sinnamon; Madalyn G Neuwirth; Pratyusha Yalamanchi; Phyllis Gimotty; David E Elder; Xiaowei Xu; Rachel R Kelz; Robert E Roses; Emily Y Chu; Michael E Ming; Douglas L Fraker; Giorgos C Karakousis
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 10.282

4.  Importance of sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with thin melanoma.

Authors:  Byron E Wright; Randall P Scheri; Xing Ye; Mark B Faries; Roderick R Turner; Richard Essner; Donald L Morton
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2008-09

5.  Meta-analysis of sentinel lymph node positivity in thin melanoma (<or=1 mm).

Authors:  Melanie A Warycha; Jan Zakrzewski; Quanhong Ni; Richard L Shapiro; Russell S Berman; Anna C Pavlick; David Polsky; Madhu Mazumdar; Iman Osman
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Is it Necessary to Perform Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Thin Melanoma? A Retrospective Single Center Analysis.

Authors:  A Kocsis; L Karsko; Zs Kurgyis; Zs Besenyi; L Pavics; E Dosa-Racz; E Kis; E Baltas; H Ocsai; E Varga; B Bende; A Varga; G Mohos; I Korom; J Varga; L Kemeny; I B Nemeth; J Olah
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 3.201

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.