Literature DB >> 17683303

Ontario doctors' attitudes toward and use of clinical practice guidelines in oncology.

Ian D Graham1, Melissa Brouwers, Christine Davies, Jacqueline Tetroe.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical practice guidelines are intended to improve patient care and outcomes. Controversy exists about the utility of guidelines and doctors' attitudes toward them. The purpose of the survey was to determine Ontario doctors' attitudes toward practice guidelines in general, awareness of, and attitudes about, Cancer Care Ontario's Practice Guideline Initiative and the evidence-based guidelines it produces, self-reported use of guidelines and, factors related to guideline use.
METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional, self-administered postal survey of 1034 Ontario doctors who treat cancer. Main outcome measures were attitudes toward practice guidelines in general, attitudes towards those developed by Cancer Care Ontario's Practice Guideline Initiative, and self-reported use of practice guidelines.
FINDINGS: A total of 520 doctors responded producing a 57% survey response rate. Ontario doctors are quite positive about practice guidelines in general and those developed by Cancer Care Ontario. Forty-four per cent reported using guidelines routinely or most of the time. Positive attitudes towards guidelines in general and the Ontario cancer guidelines specifically were related to more frequent reported use of guidelines. Other factors related to frequent reported use of guidelines included being a medical oncologist, treating gynaecological cancers and not other types of cancers.
INTERPRETATION: Ontario doctors have positive attitudes toward practice guidelines and report frequent use of them. By understanding the relationship between doctors' perceptions of specific guidelines and their subsequent adherence to them, guideline developers will be better positioned to produce quality evidence-based guidelines that doctors will find acceptable, and therefore, be more predisposed to use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17683303     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00670.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract        ISSN: 1356-1294            Impact factor:   2.431


  13 in total

1.  Is there a role for clinical practice guidelines in multidisciplinary tumor board meetings? A descriptive study of knowledge transfer between research and practice.

Authors:  Xanthoula Kostaras; Melissa A Shea-Budgell; Emily Malcolm; Jacob C Easaw; Wilson Roa; Neil A Hagen
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Breast medical oncologists' use of standard prognostic factors to predict a 21-gene recurrence score.

Authors:  Arif H Kamal; Charles L Loprinzi; Carol Reynolds; Amylou C Dueck; Xochiquetzal J Geiger; James N Ingle; Robert W Carlson; Timothy J Hobday; Eric P Winer; Matthew P Goetz
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2011-09-20

3.  Examining the introduction of a supportive care screening and referral process for cancer patients: how does practice compare with protocols?

Authors:  Melanie Regan; Eli Ristevski; Rebecca Jones; Sibilah Breen; Allison Hartney
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda.

Authors:  Enola Proctor; Hiie Silmere; Ramesh Raghavan; Peter Hovmand; Greg Aarons; Alicia Bunger; Richard Griffey; Melissa Hensley
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2011-03

5.  Physicians' attitudes and perceived barriers to adherence to the national breast cancer clinical practice guidelines in Mexico: a survey study.

Authors:  Bertha Alejandra Martinez-Cannon; Enrique Soto-Perez-de-Celis; Aura Erazo Valle-Solis; Claudia Arce-Salinas; Enrique Bargallo-Rocha; Veronica Bautista-Piña; Guadalupe Cervantes-Sanchez; Christian Haydeé Flores-Balcázar; Maria Del Carmen Lara Tamburrino; Ana Lluch; Antonio Maffuz-Aziz; Victor Manuel Pérez-Sánchez; Adela Poitevin-Chacón; Efraín Salas-González; Laura Torrecillas Torres; Vicente Valero; Yolanda Villaseñor-Navarro; Jesús Cárdenas-Sánchez
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 3.340

6.  Has the practice of radiation oncology for locally advanced and metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer changed in Canada?

Authors:  K Han; A Bezjak; W Xu; G Kane
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.677

7.  Perceptions and attitudes of clinicians in Spain toward clinical practice guidelines and grading systems: a protocol for a qualitative study and a national survey.

Authors:  Anna Kotzeva; Ivan Solà; José Miguel Carrasco; Petra Díaz del Campo; Francisco Javier Gracia; Enrique Calderón; Idoia de Gaminde; Maria Dolors Estrada; Flora Martínez; Carola Orrego; Rafael Rotaeche; Flavia Salcedo; Paola Velázquez; Pablo Alonso-Coello
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Target for improvement: a cluster randomised trial of public involvement in quality-indicator prioritisation (intervention development and study protocol).

Authors:  Antoine Boivin; Pascale Lehoux; Réal Lacombe; Anaïs Lacasse; Jako Burgers; Richard Grol
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2011-05-09       Impact factor: 7.327

9.  Clinicians' evaluations of, endorsements of, and intentions to use practice guidelines change over time: a retrospective analysis from an organized guideline program.

Authors:  Melissa Brouwers; Steven Hanna; Mona Abdel-Motagally; Jennifer Yee
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2009-06-28       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  Factors influencing the adoption of an innovation: an examination of the uptake of the Canadian Heart Health Kit (HHK).

Authors:  Shannon D Scott; Ronald C Plotnikoff; Nandini Karunamuni; Raphaël Bize; Wendy Rodgers
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 7.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.