Literature DB >> 17682341

Proteomics in cancer.

M A Reymond1, W Schlegel.   

Abstract

Proteomic studies have generated numerous datasets of potential diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic significance in human cancer. Two key technologies underpinning these studies in cancer tissue are two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (2D-PAGE) and mass spectrometry (MS). Although surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (SELDI-TOF)-MS is the mainstay for serum or plasma analysis, other methods including isotope-coded affinity tag technology, reverse-phase protein arrays, and antibody microarrays are emerging as alternative proteomic technologies. Because there is little overlap between studies conducted with these approaches, confirmation of these advanced technologies remains an elusive goal. This problem is further exacerbated by lack of uniform patient inclusion and exclusion criteria, low patient numbers, poor supporting clinical data, absence of standardized sample preparation, and limited analytical reproducibility (in particular of 2D-PAGE). Despite these problems, there is little doubt that the proteomic approach has the potential to identify novel diagnostic biomarkers in cancer. In therapeutic proteomics, the challenge is significant due to the complexity systems under investigation (i.e., cells generate over 10(5) different polypeptides). However, the most significant contribution of therapeutic proteomics research is expected to derive not from single experiments, but from the synthesis and comparison of large datasets obtained under different conditions (e.g., normal, inflammation, cancer) and in different tissues and organs. Thus, standardized processes for storing and retrieving data obtained with different technologies by different research groups will have to be developed. Shifting the emphasis of cancer proteomics from technology development and data generation to careful study design, data organization, formatting, and mining is crucial to answer clinical questions in cancer research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17682341     DOI: 10.1016/s0065-2423(07)44004-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Clin Chem        ISSN: 0065-2423            Impact factor:   5.394


  23 in total

1.  Proteomic Interrogation in Cancer Biomarker.

Authors:  Un-Beom Kang
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

2.  Proteomic analysis to identify cytokeratin 18 as a novel biomarker of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Xiang-Min Li; Wei-Guo Huang; Hong Yi; Ai-Lan Cheng; Zhi-Qiang Xiao
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  Enhanced information output from shotgun proteomics data by protein quantification and peptide quality control (PQPQ).

Authors:  Jenny Forshed; Henrik J Johansson; Maria Pernemalm; Rui M M Branca; Annsofi Sandberg; Janne Lehtiö
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 5.911

4.  Nano-channel of viral DNA packaging motor as single pore to differentiate peptides with single amino acid difference.

Authors:  Zhouxiang Ji; Xinqi Kang; Shaoying Wang; Peixuan Guo
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 12.479

5.  The proteome of normal pancreatic juice.

Authors:  Courtney J Doyle; Kyle Yancey; Henry A Pitt; Mu Wang; Kerry Bemis; Michele T Yip-Schneider; Stuart T Sherman; Keith D Lillemoe; Michael D Goggins; C Max Schmidt
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.327

6.  Serum glycan signatures of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Sureyya Ozcan; Donald A Barkauskas; L Renee Ruhaak; Javier Torres; Cara L Cooke; Hyun Joo An; Serenus Hua; Cynthia C Williams; Lauren M Dimapasoc; Jae Han Kim; Margarita Camorlinga-Ponce; David Rocke; Carlito B Lebrilla; Jay V Solnick
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2013-12-10

7.  Prognostic significance of annexin II expression in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  C-H Luo; Q-Q Liu; P-F Zhang; M-Y Li; Z-C Chen; Y-F Liu
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 3.405

8.  Elevated pressure improves the extraction and identification of proteins recovered from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue surrogates.

Authors:  Carol B Fowler; Ingrid E Chesnick; Cedric D Moore; Timothy J O'Leary; Jeffrey T Mason
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A single lysis solution for the analysis of tissue samples by different proteomic technologies.

Authors:  Pavel Gromov; Julio E Celis; Irina Gromova; Fritz Rank; Vera Timmermans-Wielenga; José M A Moreira
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 6.603

Review 10.  From bench to bedside: current and future applications of molecular profiling in renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Androu Arsanious; Georg A Bjarnason; George M Yousef
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 27.401

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.