Literature DB >> 17682340

Urokinase receptor variants in tissue and body fluids.

Gunilla Høyer-Hansen1, Ida Katrine Lund.   

Abstract

The cellular receptor for urokinase, urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) plays a central role in localizing its ligand, urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and thereby the plasminogen activation to the cell surface. uPA converts the proenzyme plasminogen to plasmin, which is involved in degradation of the extracellular matrix. In addition, uPA also cleaves uPAR, liberating the ligand-binding domain I, uPAR(I) and leaving the cleaved form, uPAR(II-III) on the cell surface. This cleavage inactivates the binding potential of uPAR toward uPA and vitronectin. uPAR can be shed from the cell surface and both intact and cleaved uPAR variants have been identified in tissue and body fluids. Identification and characterization of cleaved uPAR variants are dependent on monoclonal antibodies with known epitope specificity. Some of these have also been useful for the immunohistochemical localization of uPAR in tumor tissue. A number of immunoassays have been designed to measure uPAR and the collective amounts of all uPAR forms measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in tumor lysates or blood correlate to prognosis in several forms of cancer. However, the amounts of uPAR(I) and uPAR(II-III) may be directly related to the uPA activity and therefore be even stronger prognostic markers. Immunoassays measuring the individual uPAR forms have recently been designed and can be used to investigate this. This chapter is focused on the mechanism of uPAR cleavage and characterization and identification of the different uPAR forms in biological tissues and body fluids using immunologic methods. Monoclonal antibodies against uPAR are reviewed as well as different immunoassays used to investigate the prognostic potential of uPAR. Finally, an overview of the localization and prognostic significance of uPAR in different cancers and other malignancies is included.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17682340

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Clin Chem        ISSN: 0065-2423            Impact factor:   5.394


  16 in total

1.  Expression of C4.4A, a structural uPAR homolog, reflects squamous epithelial differentiation in the adult mouse and during embryogenesis.

Authors:  Mette C Kriegbaum; Benedikte Jacobsen; Andreas Hald; Michael Ploug
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.479

2.  Prognostic implications of the co-detection of the urokinase plasminogen activator system and osteopontin in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer undergoing radiotherapy and correlation with gross tumor volume.

Authors:  C Ostheimer; C Evers; M Bache; T Reese; D Vordermark
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  Combined mRNA expression levels of members of the urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) system correlate with disease-associated survival of soft-tissue sarcoma patients.

Authors:  Matthias Kotzsch; Viktor Magdolen; Thomas Greither; Matthias Kappler; Matthias Bache; Christine Lautenschläger; Susanne Füssel; Alexander W Eckert; Thomas Luther; Gustavo Baretton; Peter Würl; Helge Taubert
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2011-06-25       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  Inhibitory Monoclonal Antibodies against Mouse Proteases Raised in Gene-Deficient Mice Block Proteolytic Functions in vivo.

Authors:  Ida K Lund; Morten G Rasch; Signe Ingvarsen; Jesper Pass; Daniel H Madsen; Lars H Engelholm; Niels Behrendt; Gunilla Høyer-Hansen
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 5.810

5.  Further Evidence That the Soluble Urokinase Plasminogen Activator Receptor Does Not Directly Injure Mice or Human Podocytes.

Authors:  Efrat Harel; Jun Shoji; Vivek Abraham; Loan Miller; Zoltan G Laszik; Andrew King; Dejan Dobi; Gyula Szabo; Byron Hann; Minnie M Sarwal; Charles S Craik; Flavio Vincenti
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 5.385

6.  Prognostic impact of urokinase-type plasminogen activator system components in clear cell renal cell carcinoma patients without distant metastasis.

Authors:  Susanne Fuessel; Kati Erdmann; Helge Taubert; Andrea Lohse-Fischer; Stefan Zastrow; Matthias Meinhardt; Karen Bluemke; Lorenz Hofbauer; Paolo Fornara; Bernd Wullich; Gustavo Baretton; Viktor Magdolen; Manfred P Wirth; Matthias Kotzsch
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Intact and cleaved forms of the urokinase receptor enhance discrimination of cancer from non-malignant conditions in patients presenting with symptoms related to colorectal cancer.

Authors:  A F Lomholt; G Høyer-Hansen; H J Nielsen; I J Christensen
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Characterisation of urokinase plasminogen activator receptor variants in human airway and peripheral cells.

Authors:  Ceri E Stewart; Ian Sayers
Journal:  BMC Mol Biol       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 2.946

9.  Circulating Forms of Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator Receptor in Plasma Can Predict Recurrence and Survival in Patients with Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder.

Authors:  Line H Dohn; Peter Thind; Lisbeth Salling; Henriette Lindberg; Sofie Oersted; Ib J Christensen; Ole D Laerum; Martin Illemann; Hans von der Maase; Gunilla Høyer-Hansen; Helle Pappot
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 6.639

10.  Urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) on tumor-associated macrophages is a marker of poor prognosis in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Martin Illemann; Ole Didrik Laerum; Jane Preuss Hasselby; Tine Thurison; Gunilla Høyer-Hansen; Hans Jørgen Nielsen; Ib Jarle Christensen
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 4.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.