BACKGROUND: The incidence of patients with diabetic nephropathy (DN) who start renal replacement therapy (RRT) is increasing. AIM: To describe the characteristics and survival of patients with DN starting RRT in the UK. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: We analysed data for incident patients on RRT in centres participating in the Renal Association UK Renal Registry (UKRR), 1997 -2004, comparing DN vs. non-DN patients with regard to survival, social deprivation, ethnicity, gender, and age, using Cox regression models. RESULTS: DN was the most common renal disease (19%) in the 20 532 patients starting RRT. The majority of patients with DN (77%) were Caucasian. Within the Caucasian population, DN patients were more likely to be from a socially deprived area (p < 0.0001). About 20% were referred <3 months before starting RRT. The difference in crude survival was greatest in younger patients (5-year survival was 56% (DN) vs. 85% (non-DN) in patients aged 18-54 years, and 17% (DN) vs. 28% (non-DN) in patients aged >or=65 years). Despite adjusting for gender, age, treatment modality, social deprivation, referral and co-morbidities, the long-term prognosis for DN patients aged 18-54 years was worse (adjusted hazard ratio 2.13, 95%CI 1.23-3.67) than for older age groups. DISCUSSION: Patients with DN starting RRT are more likely to come from socially deprived areas. Relative risk of death is greatest in working-age DN patients and is not fully explained by recorded co-morbidity. This emphasizes the need for focused diabetes care in poorer areas, and assessment of quality of care of diabetic patients on RRT.
BACKGROUND: The incidence of patients with diabetic nephropathy (DN) who start renal replacement therapy (RRT) is increasing. AIM: To describe the characteristics and survival of patients with DN starting RRT in the UK. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: We analysed data for incident patients on RRT in centres participating in the Renal Association UK Renal Registry (UKRR), 1997 -2004, comparing DN vs. non-DN patients with regard to survival, social deprivation, ethnicity, gender, and age, using Cox regression models. RESULTS: DN was the most common renal disease (19%) in the 20 532 patients starting RRT. The majority of patients with DN (77%) were Caucasian. Within the Caucasian population, DN patients were more likely to be from a socially deprived area (p < 0.0001). About 20% were referred <3 months before starting RRT. The difference in crude survival was greatest in younger patients (5-year survival was 56% (DN) vs. 85% (non-DN) in patients aged 18-54 years, and 17% (DN) vs. 28% (non-DN) in patients aged >or=65 years). Despite adjusting for gender, age, treatment modality, social deprivation, referral and co-morbidities, the long-term prognosis for DN patients aged 18-54 years was worse (adjusted hazard ratio 2.13, 95%CI 1.23-3.67) than for older age groups. DISCUSSION: Patients with DN starting RRT are more likely to come from socially deprived areas. Relative risk of death is greatest in working-age DN patients and is not fully explained by recorded co-morbidity. This emphasizes the need for focused diabetes care in poorer areas, and assessment of quality of care of diabeticpatients on RRT.