Literature DB >> 17681540

Molecular principles of the interactions of disordered proteins.

Bálint Mészáros1, Peter Tompa, István Simon, Zsuzsanna Dosztányi.   

Abstract

Thorough knowledge of the molecular principles of protein-protein recognition is essential to our understanding of protein function at the cellular level. Whereas interactions of ordered proteins have been analyzed in great detail, complexes of intrinsically unstructured/disordered proteins (IUPs) have hardly been addressed so far. Here, we have collected a database of 39 complexes of experimentally verified IUPs, and compared their interfaces with those of 72 complexes of ordered, globular proteins. The characteristic differences found between the two types of complexes suggest that IUPs represent a distinct molecular implementation of the principles of protein-protein recognition. The interfaces do not differ in size, but those of IUPs cover a much larger part of the surface of the protein than for their ordered counterparts. Moreover, IUP interfaces are significantly more hydrophobic relative to their overall amino acid composition, but also in absolute terms. They rely more on hydrophobic-hydrophobic than on polar-polar interactions. Their amino acids in the interface realize more intermolecular contacts, which suggests a better fit with the partner due to induced folding upon binding that results in a better adaptation to the partner. The two modes of interaction also differ in that IUPs usually use only a single continuous segment for partner binding, whereas the binding sites of ordered proteins are more segmented. Probably, all these features contribute to the increased evolutionary conservation of IUP interface residues. These noted molecular differences are also manifested in the interaction energies of IUPs. Our approximation of these by low-resolution force-fields shows that IUPs gain much more stabilization energy from intermolecular contacts, than from folding, i.e. they use their binding energy for folding. Overall, our findings provide a structural rationale to the prior suggestions that many IUPs are specialized for functions realized by protein-protein interactions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17681540     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.07.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  111 in total

1.  MoRFpred, a computational tool for sequence-based prediction and characterization of short disorder-to-order transitioning binding regions in proteins.

Authors:  Fatemeh Miri Disfani; Wei-Lun Hsu; Marcin J Mizianty; Christopher J Oldfield; Bin Xue; A Keith Dunker; Vladimir N Uversky; Lukasz Kurgan
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 2.  Fuzzy complexes of myelin basic protein: NMR spectroscopic investigations of a polymorphic organizational linker of the central nervous system.

Authors:  David S Libich; Mumdooh A M Ahmed; Ligang Zhong; Vladimir V Bamm; Vladimir Ladizhansky; George Harauz
Journal:  Biochem Cell Biol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.626

3.  Net charge per residue modulates conformational ensembles of intrinsically disordered proteins.

Authors:  Albert H Mao; Scott L Crick; Andreas Vitalis; Caitlin L Chicoine; Rohit V Pappu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-04-19       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Harnessing disorder: onychophorans use highly unstructured proteins, not silks, for prey capture.

Authors:  Victoria S Haritos; Ajay Niranjane; Sarah Weisman; Holly E Trueman; Alagacone Sriskantha; Tara D Sutherland
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Perturbed amelogenin secondary structure leads to uncontrolled aggregation in amelogenesis imperfecta mutant proteins.

Authors:  Rajamani Lakshminarayanan; Keith M Bromley; Ya-Ping Lei; Malcolm L Snead; Janet Moradian-Oldak
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Electrostatically accelerated coupled binding and folding of intrinsically disordered proteins.

Authors:  Debabani Ganguly; Steve Otieno; Brett Waddell; Luigi Iconaru; Richard W Kriwacki; Jianhan Chen
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Determinants of histone H4 N-terminal domain function during nucleosomal array oligomerization: roles of amino acid sequence, domain length, and charge density.

Authors:  Steven J McBryant; Joshua Klonoski; Troy C Sorensen; Sarah S Norskog; Sere Williams; Michael G Resch; James A Toombs; Sarah E Hobdey; Jeffrey C Hansen
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Denatured-state energy landscapes of a protein structural database reveal the energetic determinants of a framework model for folding.

Authors:  Suwei Wang; Jenny Gu; Scott A Larson; Steven T Whitten; Vincent J Hilser
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2008-06-24       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 9.  Functional aspects of protein flexibility.

Authors:  Kaare Teilum; Johan G Olsen; Birthe B Kragelund
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 10.  The Tail That Wags the Dog: How the Disordered C-Terminal Domain Controls the Transcriptional Activities of the p53 Tumor-Suppressor Protein.

Authors:  Oleg Laptenko; David R Tong; James Manfredi; Carol Prives
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 13.807

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.