Literature DB >> 17680943

Planning to reach for an object changes how the reacher perceives it.

Peter M Vishton1, Nicolette J Stephens, Lauren A Nelson, Sarah E Morra, Kaitlin L Brunick, Jennifer A Stevens.   

Abstract

Three experiments assessed the influence of the Ebbinghaus illusion on size judgments that preceded verbal, grasp, or touch responses. Prior studies have found reduced effects of the illusion for the grip-scaling component of grasping, and these findings are commonly interpreted as evidence that different visual systems are employed for perceptual judgment and visually guided action. In the current experiments, the magnitude of the illusion was reduced by comparable amounts for grasping and for judgments that preceded grasping (Experiment 1). A similar effect was obtained prior to reaching to touch the targets (Experiment 2). The effect on verbal responses was apparent even when participants were simply instructed that a target touch task would follow the verbal task. After participants had completed a grasping task, the reduction in the magnitude of the illusion remained for a subsequent verbal-response judgment task (Experiment 3). Overall, the studies demonstrate strong connections between action planning and perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17680943     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01965.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  16 in total

1.  When meaning matters, look but don't touch: the effects of posture on reading.

Authors:  Christopher C Davoli; Feng Du; Juan Montana; Susan Garverick; Richard A Abrams
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-07

2.  How do illusions constrain goal-directed movement: perceptual and visuomotor influences on speed/accuracy trade-off.

Authors:  Joshua C Skewes; Andreas Roepstorff; Christopher D Frith
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Moving further moves things further away in visual perception: position-based movement planning affects distance judgments.

Authors:  Wladimir Kirsch; Wilfried Kunde
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  A bias to detail: how hand position modulates visual learning and visual memory.

Authors:  Christopher C Davoli; James R Brockmole; Annabelle Goujon
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-04

5.  Action goals influence action-specific perception.

Authors:  Rouwen Cañal-Bruland; John van der Kamp
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-12

6.  State-trace analysis of the effects of a visual illusion on saccade amplitudes and perceptual judgments.

Authors:  Jason S McCarley; Christopher Grant
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-10

7.  How preparation to touch or grasp alters visual size perception.

Authors:  Peter M Vishton; Evan D Jones; Jennifer A Stevens
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2015-09

8.  Improved change detection with nearby hands.

Authors:  Philip Tseng; Bruce Bridgeman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-01-30       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Hand proximity differentially affects visual working memory for color and orientation in a binding task.

Authors:  Shane P Kelly; James R Brockmole
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-04-21

10.  Determinants of attentional modulation near the hands.

Authors:  Holger Schultheis; Laura A Carlson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-11-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.