Literature DB >> 17680863

Comparison and correlation between stinging responses to lactic acid and bioengineering parameters.

Susun An1, Eunyoung Lee, Seunghun Kim, Gaewon Nam, Haekwang Lee, Seongjoon Moon, Ihseop Chang.   

Abstract

In evaluating the safety of a novel cosmetic product or a new chemical, it is important to assess susceptible population. One group of subjects is known to stingers who are more likely to experience sensory effects such as stinging and burning after contacting with cosmetics. The purpose of the study is to measure skin biophysical parameters noninvasively in stingers and non-stingers and to see their correlations with stinging responses. 298 women were evaluated by modified lactic acid stinging test with 5% lactic acid solution rather than classic 10% solution because of strong reaction in Asian populations. Transepidermal water loss (TEWL), skin hydration, sebum content, and pH were measured using the bioengineering instruments in an environment-controlled room. Correlations between stinging responses and skin biophysical parameters were statistically analysed. There was a positive correlation between stinging responses and TEWL evaluation. However, no correlations was observed between stinging responses and other parameters such as skin hydration, sebum content, and pH. Our data indicate that there is a relationship between the degree of stinging and the skin barrier function. However, we believe that various additional studies are necessary to characterize skin of stingers and the pathogenesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17680863     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01182.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contact Dermatitis        ISSN: 0105-1873            Impact factor:   6.600


  7 in total

1.  Sensitive Skin: Assessment of the Skin Barrier Using Confocal Raman Microspectroscopy.

Authors:  Renée J H Richters; Denise Falcone; Natallia E Uzunbajakava; Babu Varghese; Peter J Caspers; Gerwin J Puppels; Piet E J van Erp; Peter C M van de Kerkhof
Journal:  Skin Pharmacol Physiol       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 3.479

2.  Proposal of a self-assessment questionnaire for the diagnosis of sensitive skin.

Authors:  Monica Corazza; Fabrizio Guarneri; Leda Montesi; Giulia Toni; Irene Donelli; Alessandro Borghi
Journal:  J Cosmet Dermatol       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 2.189

3.  Skin Biophysical Parameters and Patch Test Results in People Predisposing to Xiaotong Tiegao Induced Irritant Contact Dermatitis.

Authors:  Hai-Yan Cheng; Lin-Feng Li
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2019-02-24       Impact factor: 2.629

Review 4.  Sensitive Skin: Lessons From Transcriptomic Studies.

Authors:  Adeline Bataille; Christelle Le Gall-Ianotto; Emmanuelle Genin; Laurent Misery
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2019-05-28

5.  Association between lactic acid sting test scores, self-assessed sensitive skin scores and biophysical properties in Chinese females.

Authors:  D-M Ding; Y Tu; M-Q Man; W-J Wu; F-Y Lu; X Li; Y Li; J-T Yang; Y-M Jin; C-Y Yang; L He
Journal:  Int J Cosmet Sci       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 2.970

6.  Questionnaire and Lactic Acid Sting Test Play Different Role on the Assessment of Sensitive Skin: A Cross-sectional Study.

Authors:  Yao Pan; Xue Ma; Yanqing Song; Jinfeng Zhao; Shiyu Yan
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol       Date:  2021-09-14

7.  Cutaneous vessel features of sensitive skin and its underlying functions.

Authors:  Wen-Cai Jiang; Hui Zhang; Yafei Xu; Changqing Jiang; Yingying Xu; Wei Liu; Yimei Tan
Journal:  Skin Res Technol       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 2.365

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.