Literature DB >> 17680861

How to optimize patch testing with diphenylmethane diisocyanate.

Malin Frick-Engfeldt1, Marléne Isaksson, Erik Zimerson, Magnus Bruze.   

Abstract

We have previously shown that patch test preparations of polymeric diphenylmethane diisocyanate (PMDI) are more stable than preparations of diphenylmethane-4,4'-diisocyanate (4,4'-MDI). This study was conducted to (i) investigate whether PMDIs yield as many positive reactions as 4,4'-MDI, (ii) study concurrent reactions to 4,4'-MDI and 4,4'-diaminodiphenylmethane (4,4'-MDA), and (iii) follow the course of positive reactions during 4 weeks. It was shown that PMDIs detect as many positive reactions as 4,4'-MDI. Thus, they are better patch test agents being more stable than preparations of 4,4'-MDI. We recommend that PMDIs with a monomer content of at least 35% is used in 2.0% petrolatum (pet.) (i.e. monomer patch test concentration approximately 0.7%). It was shown that reactions to 4,4'-MDI and PMDIs appear late and we recommend readings on both day (D) 3/4 and D7. 4,4'-MDA was shown to be a good marker for 4,4'-MDI and patch testing with 4,4'-MDA in 0.25% pet. can be used instead of PMDI. Concomitant reactions to 4,4'-MDI and 4,4'-MDA are probably not caused by conversion of 4,4'-MDI into 4,4'-MDA by reaction with water. Another explanation is a path of reactions leading to ureas and MDI conjugates with skin constituents, which are hydrolysed into 4,4'-MDA. This complex process depends upon several factors and might explain why positive MDI reactions appear after D7.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17680861     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01197.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contact Dermatitis        ISSN: 0105-1873            Impact factor:   6.600


  5 in total

1.  The necessity of a test reading after 1 week to detect late positive patch test reactions in patients with oral lichen lesions.

Authors:  Camilla Ahlgren; Marléne Isaksson; Halvor Möller; Tony Axéll; Rolf Liedholm; Magnus Bruze
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-10-06       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  Laboratory Techniques for Identifying Causes of Allergic Dermatitis.

Authors:  Itai Chipinda; Stacey E Anderson; Paul D Siegel
Journal:  Immunol Allergy Clin North Am       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 3.479

3.  Concentrations and stability of methyl methacrylate, glutaraldehyde, formaldehyde and nickel sulfate in commercial patch test allergen preparations.

Authors:  Paul D Siegel; Joseph F Fowler; Brandon F Law; Erin M Warshaw; James S Taylor
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 6.600

4.  Sensitization and cross-reactivity patterns of contact allergy to diisocyanates and corresponding amines: investigation of diphenylmethane-4,4'-diisocyanate, diphenylmethane-4,4'-diamine, dicyclohexylmethane-4,4'-diisocyanate, and dicylohexylmethane-4,4'-diamine.

Authors:  Haneen Hamada; Magnus Bruze; Erik Zimerson; Marléne Isaksson; Malin Engfeldt
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 6.600

5.  Occupational contact allergy in bricklayers, tile setters etc. - Current spectrum of sensitization and recent time trends.

Authors:  J Geier; H Lessmann; C Skudlik; B K Ballmer-Weber; E Weisshaar; W Uter; A Schnuch
Journal:  Allergol Select       Date:  2017-08-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.