Literature DB >> 17680833

Estimating the intensity of a spatial point process from locations coarsened by incomplete geocoding.

Dale L Zimmerman1.   

Abstract

The estimation of spatial intensity is an important inference problem in spatial epidemiologic studies. A standard data assimilation component of these studies is the assignment of a geocode, that is, point-level spatial coordinates, to the address of each subject in the study population. Unfortunately, when geocoding is performed by the standard automated method of street-segment matching to a georeferenced road file and subsequent interpolation, it is rarely completely successful. Typically, 10-30% of the addresses in the study population, and even higher percentages in particular subgroups, fail to geocode, potentially leading to a selection bias, called geographic bias, and an inefficient analysis. Missing-data methods could be considered for analyzing such data; however, because there is almost always some geographic information coarser than a point (e.g., a Zip code) observed for the addresses that fail to geocode, a coarsened-data analysis is more appropriate. This article develops methodology for estimating spatial intensity from coarsened geocoded data. Both nonparametric (kernel smoothing) and likelihood-based estimation procedures are considered. Substantial improvements in the estimation quality of coarsened-data analyses relative to analyses of only the observations that geocode are demonstrated via simulation and an example from a rural health study in Iowa.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17680833     DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00870.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  13 in total

1.  Potential selection bias associated with using geocoded birth records for epidemiologic research.

Authors:  Sandie Ha; Hui Hu; Liang Mao; Dikea Roussos-Ross; Jeffrey Roth; Xiaohui Xu
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 3.797

2.  Estimating seasonal onsets and peaks of bronchiolitis with spatially and temporally uncertain data.

Authors:  Sierra Pugh; Matthew J Heaton; Brian Hartman; Candace Berrett; Chantel Sloan; Amber M Evans; Tebeb Gebretsadik; Pingsheng Wu; Tina V Hartert; Rees L Lee
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2019-01-13       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Geostatistical analysis of health data with different levels of spatial aggregation.

Authors:  Pierre Goovaerts
Journal:  Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol       Date:  2012-02-11

4.  A research agenda: does geocoding positional error matter in health GIS studies?

Authors:  Geoffrey M Jacquez
Journal:  Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol       Date:  2012-02-14

5.  Split and combine simulation extrapolation algorithm to correct geocoding coarsening of built environment exposures.

Authors:  Jung Y Won; Emma V Sanchez-Vaznaugh; Yuqi Zhai; Brisa N Sánchez
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 2.497

6.  Spatial autocorrelation among automated geocoding errors and its effects on testing for disease clustering.

Authors:  Dale L Zimmerman; Jie Li; Xiangming Fang
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Using imputation to provide location information for nongeocoded addresses.

Authors:  Frank C Curriero; Martin Kulldorff; Francis P Boscoe; Ann C Klassen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Local indicators of geocoding accuracy (LIGA): theory and application.

Authors:  Geoffrey M Jacquez; Robert Rommel
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 3.918

9.  Modeling Bronchiolitis Incidence Proportions in the Presence of Spatio-Temporal Uncertainty.

Authors:  Matthew J Heaton; Candace Berrett; Sierra Pugh; Amber Evans; Chantel Sloan
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 5.033

10.  A case-referent study: light at night and breast cancer risk in Georgia.

Authors:  Sarah E Bauer; Sara E Wagner; Jim Burch; Rana Bayakly; John E Vena
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 3.918

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.