Literature DB >> 17680638

Pasteurized autograft-prosthesis composite for reconstruction of proximal tibia in 13 sarcoma patients.

Dae-Geun Jeon1, Min Suk Kim, Wan Hyeong Cho, Won Seok Song, Soo-Yong Lee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to ascertain the survival of the pasteurized autograft-prosthesis composite and functional outcome of this procedure, and to evaluate the complications including nonunion, infection, loosening, bony resorption, and fracture.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 13 proximal tibial sarcoma patients who underwent tibia reconstructions with using a pasteurized autograft-prosthesis between 1993 and 2003.
RESULTS: Four patients underwent removal of the composite with a minimum follow-up of 11 months (average: 43 months, range: 11-75 months). The survival rate of the 13 composites, as calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method, was 76.9% at 5 years. The primary cause of removing the composite was infection in three patients and loosening in one patient. The average MSTS functional score of 11 patients was 23.6 +/- 3.3 (79%). Nonunion was identified in four patients, while infection developed in three patients. Loosening of the stem and resorption of the pasteurized bone was detected in one case each. No patient developed fracture of autograft.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the pasteurized autograft-prosthesis has comparable functional outcome and complication rates as other methods, such as endoprosthesis and allograft-prosthetic composite and it offers a reconstructive option for surgeons who do not have access to large allograft banks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17680638     DOI: 10.1002/jso.20840

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0022-4790            Impact factor:   3.454


  11 in total

Review 1.  Megaprosthesis versus Allograft Prosthesis Composite for massive skeletal defects.

Authors:  Deepak Gautam; Rajesh Malhotra
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-09-25

2.  Telescope allograft method to reconstitute the diaphysis in limb salvage surgery.

Authors:  John H Healey; Ayesha Abdeen; Carol D Morris; Edward A Athanasian; Patrick J Boland
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-03       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Can bone scintigraphy predict the final outcome of pasteurized autografts?

Authors:  Ahmed Shawky Eid; Dae-Geun Jeon; Wan Hyeong Cho
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Are Pasteurized Autografts Durable for Reconstructions After Bone Tumor Resections?

Authors:  Seung Yong Lee; Dae-Geun Jeon; Wan Hyeong Cho; Won Seok Song; Bum Suk Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Does Local Zoledronate Applied to Pasteurized Bone Autografts Improve the Likelihood of Union of Graft-Host Junctions after Limb-sparing Surgery?

Authors:  Piya Kiatisevi; Bhasanan Sukanthanak; Pongsiri Piakong; Piyabuth Kittithamvongs
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 4.755

6.  The healing process of intracorporeally and in situ devitalized distal femur by microwave in a dog model and its mechanical properties in vitro.

Authors:  Zhenwei Ji; Yunlei Ma; Wei Li; Xiaoxiang Li; Guangyi Zhao; Zhe Yun; Jixian Qian; Qingyu Fan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  CORR Insights®: Does Local Zoledronate Applied to Pasteurized Bone Autografts Improve the Likelihood of Union of Graft-Host Junctions after Limb-sparing Surgery?

Authors:  Timothy A Damron
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 4.755

8.  What Is the Survival of the Telescope Allograft Technique to Augment a Short Proximal Femur Segment in Children After Resection and Distal Femur Endoprosthesis Reconstruction for a Bone Sarcoma?

Authors:  Suraj Hindiskere; Eric Staals; Davide Maria Donati; Marco Manfrini
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 4.755

9.  Pasteurized Autograft-Prosthesis Composite Reconstruction May Not Be a Viable Primary Procedure for Large Skeletal Defects after Resection of Sarcoma.

Authors:  Seung Yong Lee; Dae-Geun Jeon; Wan Hyeong Cho; Won Seok Song; Chang-Bae Kong; Bum Suk Kim
Journal:  Sarcoma       Date:  2017-06-04

10.  Cemented endoprosthetic reconstruction of the proximal tibia: how long do they last?

Authors:  Adam J Schwartz; J Michael Kabo; Fritz C Eilber; Frederick R Eilber; Jeffrey J Eckardt
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.