Literature DB >> 17680630

Expression analysis of pluripotency factors in the undifferentiated porcine inner cell mass and epiblast during in vitro culture.

Le Ann Blomberg1, Lori L Schreier, Neil C Talbot.   

Abstract

Limited understanding of the importance of known pluripotency factors in pig embryonic stem cells (ESC) impedes the establishment and validation of porcine ESC lines. This study evaluated the expression of known mouse ESC and human ESC (hESC) pluripotency markers in in vivo inner cell mass (ICM) and in vitro-cultured undifferentiated porcine epiblast cells isolated from 8-day porcine blastocysts, primary cultures of epiblast-derived neuroprogenitor cells, and endoderm cells. The expression profile of common pluripotency markers (POU domain 5 transcript factor 1, SRY-box containing gene 2, and Nanog homeobox), species-specific markers, ESC-associated factors, and differentiation markers was evaluated. The mRNA of uncultured ICMs, cultured epiblast cells, epiblast-derived neuroprogenitor cells, and endoderm cells was amplified prior to expression analysis of candidate genes by real-time RT-PCR. ESC factors whose expression correlated best with the undifferentiated epiblast state were identified by comparative mRNA expression analysis between porcine epiblast-derived somatic cell lines, fetal fibroblasts, and adult tissues. Across tissue types Nanog homeobox exhibited ubiquitous expression, whereas POU domain 5 transcript factor 1, teratocarcinoma-derived growth factor 1, and RNA exonuclease homolog 1 transcript expression was restricted primarily to undifferentiated epiblasts. Our results suggested that expression of pluripotency markers in undifferentiated pig epiblast cells more closely resembled that observed in hESC. Expression alterations of ESC-associated factors in epiblast cells were also observed during in vitro culture. Our data demonstrate the potential use of some pluripotency factors as markers of porcine epiblast stem cells and indicate that the in vitro environment may influence the cultured epiblast's developmental state. Copyright 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 17680630     DOI: 10.1002/mrd.20780

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev        ISSN: 1040-452X            Impact factor:   2.609


  17 in total

1.  Feeder-independent continuous culture of the PICM-19 pig liver stem cell line.

Authors:  Neil C Talbot; Le Ann Blomberg; Wesley M Garrett; Thomas J Caperna
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 2.416

Review 2.  The pursuit of ES cell lines of domesticated ungulates.

Authors:  Neil C Talbot; Le Ann Blomberg
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 5.739

Review 3.  Porcine embryonic stem cells: a possible source for cell replacement therapy.

Authors:  Vanessa Hall
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.739

4.  Culture of porcine hepatocytes or bile duct epithelial cells by inductive serum-free media.

Authors:  Thomas J Caperna; Le Ann Blomberg; Wesley M Garrett; Neil C Talbot
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 2.416

5.  Expression and localization of nodal in bovine oviduct and uterus during different functional stages of oestrus cycle and pregnancy.

Authors:  Martin Eduardo Argañaraz; Silvana Andrea Apichela; Rebecca Kenngott; Margarethe Vermeheren; Daniela Rodler; Gustavo Adolfo Palma; Dora Cristina Miceli; Fred Sinowatz
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 4.304

6.  Pig epiblast stem cells depend on activin/nodal signaling for pluripotency and self-renewal.

Authors:  Ramiro Alberio; Nicola Croxall; Cinzia Allegrucci
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.272

7.  Culture conditions and signalling networks promoting the establishment of cell lines from parthenogenetic and biparental pig embryos.

Authors:  Tiziana A L Brevini; Georgia Pennarossa; Laura Attanasio; Arianna Vanelli; Bianca Gasparrini; Fulvio Gandolfi
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.739

8.  miRNAs promote generation of porcine-induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Kuiying Ma; Guangqi Song; Xinglan An; Anran Fan; Wentao Tan; Bo Tang; Xueming Zhang; Ziyi Li
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 3.396

Review 9.  The promise of stem cell research in pigs and other ungulate species.

Authors:  Bhanu Prakash V L Telugu; Toshihiko Ezashi; R Michael Roberts
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.739

10.  Derivation of induced pluripotent stem cells from pig somatic cells.

Authors:  Toshihiko Ezashi; Bhanu Prakash V L Telugu; Andrei P Alexenko; Shrikesh Sachdev; Sunilima Sinha; R Michael Roberts
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.