Literature DB >> 17680346

Delimiting the concept of research: an ethical perspective.

Lisa Bortolotti1, Bert Heinrichs.   

Abstract

It is important to be able to offer an account of which activities count as scientific research, given our current interest in promoting research as a means to benefit humankind and in ethically regulating it. We attempt to offer such an account, arguing that we need to consider both the procedural and functional dimensions of an activity before we can establish whether it is a genuine instance of scientific research. By placing research in a broader schema of activities, the similarities and differences between research activities and other activities become visible. It is also easier to show why some activities that do not count as research can sometimes be confused with research and why some other activities can be regarded only partially as research. Although the concept of research is important to delimit a class of activities which we might be morally obliged to promote, we observe that the class of activities which are regarded as subject to ethical regulation is not exhausted by research activities. We argue that, whether they be research or not, all the activities that are likely to affect the rights and interests of the individuals involved and impact on the rights and interests of other individuals raise ethical issues and might be in need of ethical regulation.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17680346     DOI: 10.1007/s11017-007-9036-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth        ISSN: 1386-7415


  5 in total

1.  Scientific research is a moral duty.

Authors:  John Harris
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Deception in psychology: moral costs and benefits of unsought self-knowledge.

Authors:  Lisa Bortolotti; Matteo Mameli
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2006 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 3.  Japanese biological warfare research on humans: a case study of microbiology and ethics.

Authors:  S Harris
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1992-12-31       Impact factor: 5.691

4.  Freedom of scientific inquiry and the public interest. The accountability of science as an agent of social action.

Authors:  H Jonas
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1976-08       Impact factor: 2.683

5.  Cardiovascular risk associated with celecoxib in a clinical trial for colorectal adenoma prevention.

Authors:  Scott D Solomon; John J V McMurray; Marc A Pfeffer; Janet Wittes; Robert Fowler; Peter Finn; William F Anderson; Ann Zauber; Ernest Hawk; Monica Bertagnolli
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 91.245

  5 in total
  2 in total

1.  Surgical innovation as sui generis surgical research.

Authors:  Mianna Lotz
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2013-12

2.  The appeal and challenges of an integrative approach to psychiatry.

Authors:  Rafael Ambríz González; Lisa Bortolotti
Journal:  Braz J Psychiatry       Date:  2022 May-Jun
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.