Literature DB >> 17680175

Predictive assessment of shunt effectiveness in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus by determining regional cerebral blood flow on 3D stereotactic surface projections.

M Murakami1, Y Hirata, J-I Kuratsu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) and cerebral metabolism in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) remain to be studied in detail.
PURPOSE: Using single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), we compared the characteristic rCBF patterns in iNPH patients who did, or did not, respond to shunt operations.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 24 consecutive iNPH patients: 14 men and 10 women aged 68 to 88 years (mean 77.5 years). Using the Japanese normal pressure hydrocephalus grading scale, they were divided into responders and non-responders to shunt operations. Follow-up ranged from 10 to 36 months (mean 25 months). We obtained baseline single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) data on three-dimensional stereotactic surface projections (3D-SSP) before and after shunt operations, and compared rCBF in responders and non-responders.
RESULTS: On statistical maps, responders manifested significantly lower rCBF in the basal frontal lobes and cingulate gyrus (anterior-dominant).
CONCLUSIONS: The preoperative measurement of rCBF by 3D-SSP SPECT may help to identify iNHP patients expected to exhibit a good response to shunt operations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17680175     DOI: 10.1007/s00701-007-1259-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)        ISSN: 0001-6268            Impact factor:   2.216


  6 in total

1.  Pre-and postoperative cerebral blood flow changes in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus measured by computed tomography (CT)-perfusion.

Authors:  Doerthe Ziegelitz; Jonathan Arvidsson; Per Hellström; Mats Tullberg; Carsten Wikkelsø; Göran Starck
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 6.200

2.  Cognitive profile of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Makoto Saito; Yoshiyuki Nishio; Shigenori Kanno; Makoto Uchiyama; Akiko Hayashi; Masahito Takagi; Hirokazu Kikuchi; Hiroshi Yamasaki; Tatsuo Shimomura; Osamu Iizuka; Etsuro Mori
Journal:  Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra       Date:  2011-07-15

3.  Neuropsychiatric Manifestations of Cognitively Advanced Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Robert Mathew; Sauda Pavithran; P Byju
Journal:  Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra       Date:  2018-12-06

Review 4.  Pathophysiological Mechanisms Underlying Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: A Review of Recent Insights.

Authors:  Phillip A Bonney; Robert G Briggs; Kevin Wu; Wooseong Choi; Anadjeet Khahera; Brandon Ojogho; Xingfeng Shao; Zhen Zhao; Matthew Borzage; Danny J J Wang; Charles Liu; Darrin J Lee
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 5.750

5.  Normalized power variance of eLORETA at high-convexity area predicts shunt response in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Yasunori Aoki; Hiroaki Kazui; Ricardo Bruña; Roberto D Pascual-Marqui; Kenji Yoshiyama; Tamiki Wada; Hideki Kanemoto; Yukiko Suzuki; Takashi Suehiro; Takuya Matsumoto; Kyosuke Kakeda; Masahiro Hata; Leonides Canuet; Ryouhei Ishii; Masao Iwase; Manabu Ikeda
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Clinical predictors of shunt response in the diagnosis and treatment of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Santhosh G Thavarajasingam; Mahmoud El-Khatib; Mark Rea; Salvatore Russo; Johannes Lemcke; Lana Al-Nusair; Peter Vajkoczy
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 2.216

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.