Literature DB >> 17679578

Mechanisms of electrode induced injury. Part 2: Clinical experience.

Terry Patterson1, Mark M Stecker, Brett L Netherton.   

Abstract

In the previous paper in this series, basic mechanisms of electrode related injuries were discussed. In this paper, the discussion begins with some of the clinical aspects of burns. This is followed by a summary of the clinical literature on injuries produced by surface and subdermal electrodes. This clinical literature demonstrates that most electrode burns are related to the presence of high frequency electric fields (RF) created either by an electrosurgical unit or a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner. A smaller number of lesions are produced by low current, long duration direct current (DC) stimulation and during high current stimulation such as defibrillation. A discussion of the clinical complications from indwelling intracranial electrodes centers on electrodes placed for deep brain stimulation (DBS) that are currently used therapeutically in a wide array of neurologic disorders. The probability of considering a post-implant MRI scan is high and the safety of such scans is the focus of discussion. A very small number of adverse incidents have indicated a downward revision in the specific absorption rate recommendations for MRI examination with those patients who present with indwelling DBS leads and internal pulse generators. Continued vigilance when any type of electrode is used is important.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17679578

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Electroneurodiagnostic Technol        ISSN: 1086-508X


  2 in total

1.  The effects of ultrasound and alternating current on the laser penetration in the tissue.

Authors:  Munqith Saleem Dawood
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  Case-study of a user-driven prosthetic arm design: bionic hand versus customized body-powered technology in a highly demanding work environment.

Authors:  Wolf Schweitzer; Michael J Thali; David Egger
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 4.262

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.