Literature DB >> 17676201

Comparison of midazolam, propofol and fentanyl combinations for sedation and hemodynamic parameters in cataract extraction.

Varol Celiker1, Elif Basgul, Altan Sahin, Sennur Uzun, Betul Bahadir, Ulku Aypar.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Midazolam, propofol and fentanyl were compared in terms of sedation during cataract extraction. Hemodynamic parameters, sedation level, postoperative satisfaction, and side effects were investigated.
METHODS: The study was carried out in Hacettepe University Hospitals Ophthalmology Operating Theatres in 2005. The patients received only midazolam (0.02 mg kg-1), or midazolam (0.02 mg kg-1) + propofol (0.2 mg kg-1), or midazolam (0.02 mg kg-1) + fentanyl (1 microgram kg-1), or midazolam (0.02 mg kg-1) + propofol (0.2 mg kg-1) + fentanyl (1 microgram kg-1). The sedation level of patients was measured according to a physician questionnaire. Postoperative nausea/vomiting, headache, and patient satisfaction were determined via a patient's evaluation scale.
RESULTS: In the groups receiving fentanyl, the hemodynamic response to peribulbar block insertion was minimal (p<0.05) and the sedation level was best (p<0.05). Respiration rate and O2 saturation of patients receiving midazolam, propofol, and fentanyl decreased after sedation (p<0.01) and postoperative satisfaction was high in this group (p<0.01). Patients in the midazolam group showed a prominent reaction to peribulbar block insertion while movement during the operation was obvious (p<0.05).
CONCLUSION: The combination of midazolam, propofol, and fentanyl should be preferred to other study groups as the sedation level is suitable for cataract extraction with high postoperative patient satisfaction and without any side effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17676201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Saudi Med J        ISSN: 0379-5284            Impact factor:   1.484


  5 in total

1.  Dexmedetomidine is effective for monitored anesthesia care in outpatients undergoing cataract surgery.

Authors:  Hyo-Seok Na; In-Ae Song; Hong-Sik Park; Jung-Won Hwang; Sang-Hwan Do; Chong-Soo Kim
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2011-12-20

2.  The comparison of monitored anesthesia care with dexmedetomidine and spinal anesthesia during varicose vein surgery.

Authors:  Eun-Jin Moon; Ki-Woon Kang; Jun-Young Chung; Jong-Man Kang; Je-Hoon Park; Jin-Hyun Joh; Ho-Chul Park; Jae-Woo Yi
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 1.859

3.  Comparison of the Effects of Dexmedetomidine and Remifentanil on Cognition State After Cataract Surgery.

Authors:  Mahtab Poorzamany Nejat Kermany; Mastaneh Dahi; Reyhaneh Yamini Sharif; Badiozaman Radpay
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2016-05-09

4.  The comparison of sedation quality, side effect and recovery profiles on different dosage of remifentanil patient-controlled sedation during breast biopsy surgery.

Authors:  Jin-Deok Joo; Jang Hyeok In; Dae-Woo Kim; Hong Soo Jung; Jae Hyeok Kang; Je Hwa Yeom; Jin Woo Choi
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2012-11-16

5.  Sedative efficacy of propofol in patients intubated/ventilated after coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Authors:  Nahid Aghdaii; Frouzan Yazdanian; Seyedeh Zahra Faritus
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2014-02-28
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.