Literature DB >> 17675649

Cost-effectiveness analyses of health promotion programs: a case study of smoking prevention and cessation among Dutch students.

S M C Vijgen1, P H M van Baal, R T Hoogenveen, G A de Wit, T L Feenstra.   

Abstract

Little research has been done to connect health promotion programs to outcomes in terms of life expectancy, health care costs and cost-effectiveness. For a policy maker, economic evaluation may be an important tool to support decisions on how to allocate the health care budget. The aim of this paper was to determine the cost-effectiveness of a Dutch school-based smoking education program. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of the school program was estimated at euro19 900 per quality adjusted life year gained. For a complete analysis, not only intervention costs but also savings for smoking-related diseases and differences in total health care costs should be taken into account. As several assumptions had to be made in order to estimate cost-effectiveness, the study outcomes should be interpreted with caution. Main problem in estimating the cost-effectiveness was the lack of proper effectiveness data on daily smokers among adolescents. Absence of specific effectiveness data often is an obstacle in the economic evaluation of public health interventions. While some problems may be the result of insufficient sample size or follow-up, another possible explanation might be the different basic principles of analysis of health promoters and economists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17675649     DOI: 10.1093/her/cym024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Educ Res        ISSN: 0268-1153


  7 in total

Review 1.  Targeting Health Behaviors to Reduce Health Care Costs in Pediatric Psychology: Descriptive Review and Recommendations.

Authors:  Meghan E McGrady; Kevin A Hommel
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2015-09-10

2.  Reducing smoking in adolescents: cost-effectiveness results from the cluster randomized ASSIST (A Stop Smoking In Schools Trial).

Authors:  William Hollingworth; David Cohen; James Hawkins; Rachael A Hughes; Laurence A R Moore; Jo C Holliday; Suzanne Audrey; Fenella Starkey; Rona Campbell
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 4.244

Review 3.  Towards an integrated approach in surveillance of vector-borne diseases in Europe.

Authors:  Marieta Braks; Joke van der Giessen; Mirjam Kretzschmar; Wifrid van Pelt; Ernst-Jan Scholte; Chantal Reusken; Hervé Zeller; Wim van Bortel; Hein Sprong
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 3.876

4.  Modeling the potential effects of new tobacco products and policies: a dynamic population model for multiple product use and harm.

Authors:  Eric D Vugrin; Brian L Rostron; Stephen J Verzi; Nancy S Brodsky; Theresa J Brown; Conrad J Choiniere; Blair N Coleman; Antonio Paredes; Benjamin J Apelberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Cost-effectiveness of tobacco control policies and programmes targeting adolescents: a systematic review.

Authors:  Teresa Leão; Anton E Kunst; Julian Perelman
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 3.367

Review 6.  Systematic review of economic evaluations of interventions for high risk young people.

Authors:  Kim Edmunds; Rod Ling; Anthony Shakeshaft; Chris Doran; Andrew Searles
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Cost of youth tobacco-control policies in seven European countries.

Authors:  Teresa Leão; Julian Perelman; Luke Clancy; Laura Hoffmann; Jaana M Kinnunen; Nora Mélard; Paulien A W Nuyts; Matthias Richter; Arja Rimpelä; Vincent Lorant; Anton E Kunst
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 3.367

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.