Literature DB >> 17675585

Drug and reinforcement history as determinants of the response-maintaining effects of quinpirole in the rat.

Gregory T Collins1, James H Woods.   

Abstract

The present study examined the effect of drug and reinforcement history on quinpirole-maintained responding in rats. Quinpirole (0.01, 0.032, or 0.1 mg/kg per injection) was assessed as a reinforcer in experimentally naive rats, as well as in rats trained to self-administer cocaine, remifentanil, ketamine, or food under a fixed ratio 1 schedule of reinforcement. Quinpirole failed to maintain responding in experimentally naive rats, or in ketamine- or food-trained rats. However, robust responding was maintained in rats with a history of cocaine reinforcement, and modest levels of responding were observed in rats with a history of responding for remifentanil. In a second set of studies, the effects of protracted drug histories on quinpirole-maintained responding in food-trained rats were assessed. Rats were maintained with food reinforcement, and different groups of rats were then allowed to respond for saline, quinpirole, and response-contingent cocaine or were administered noncontingent cocaine; all rats were subsequently allowed to respond for quinpirole. Only rats that previously responded for cocaine showed quinpirole-maintained responding; all other conditions failed to establish quinpirole-maintained responding. Although the high levels of quinpirole-maintained responding observed when quinpirole was substituted for cocaine are suggestive of positive reinforcing effects, these response-maintaining effects were highly dependent upon both drug and reinforcement history, suggesting that quinpirole may only function as a reinforcer under very specific conditions. The behavioral effects of quinpirole under these situations represent a novel constellation of actions relative to other drug reinforcers, and they suggest that the direct effects of self-administered quinpirole may be important in establishing the response-maintaining effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17675585     DOI: 10.1124/jpet.107.123042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther        ISSN: 0022-3565            Impact factor:   4.030


  35 in total

1.  Influence of cocaine history on the behavioral effects of Dopamine D(3) receptor-selective compounds in monkeys.

Authors:  B L Blaylock; R W Gould; A Banala; P Grundt; R R Luedtke; A H Newman; M A Nader
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 7.853

2.  Self-administration of cocaine induces dopamine-independent self-administration of sigma agonists.

Authors:  Takato Hiranita; Maddalena Mereu; Paul L Soto; Gianluigi Tanda; Jonathan L Katz
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 7.853

3.  Lack of abuse potential in a highly selective dopamine D3 agonist, PF-592,379, in drug self-administration and drug discrimination in rats.

Authors:  Gregory T Collins; Paul Butler; Chris Wayman; Sian Ratcliffe; Paul Gupta; Geoffrey Oberhofer; S Barak Caine
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.293

4.  Opposing effects of dopamine D1- and D2-like agonists on intracranial self-stimulation in male rats.

Authors:  Matthew F Lazenka; Luke P Legakis; S Stevens Negus
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 3.157

5.  Effects of pramipexole on the reinforcing effectiveness of stimuli that were previously paired with cocaine reinforcement in rats.

Authors:  Gregory T Collins; Alyssa R Cunningham; Jianyong Chen; Shaomeng Wang; Amy H Newman; James H Woods
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Pharmacological and non-pharmacological factors that regulate the acquisition of ketamine self-administration in rats.

Authors:  Marco Venniro; Anna Mutti; Cristiano Chiamulera
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Dopamine D1 receptor antagonist reduces stimulant-induced conditioned place preferences and dopamine receptor supersensitivity.

Authors:  Sun Mi Gu; Hye Jin Cha; So Woon Seo; Jin Tae Hong; Jaesuk Yun
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 8.  Principles of laboratory assessment of drug abuse liability and implications for clinical development.

Authors:  Lawrence P Carter; Roland R Griffiths
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 4.492

9.  Influence of conditioned reinforcement on the response-maintaining effects of quinpirole in rats.

Authors:  Gregory T Collins; James H Woods
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.293

10.  Determinants of conditioned reinforcing effectiveness: Dopamine D2-like receptor agonist-stimulated responding for cocaine-associated stimuli.

Authors:  Gregory T Collins; Charles P France
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2015-11-21       Impact factor: 4.432

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.