Literature DB >> 17675143

In vitro cytotoxic response to lithium disilicate dental ceramics.

Martha Goël Brackett1, Petra E Lockwood, Regina L W Messer, Jill B Lewis, Serge Bouillaguet, John C Wataha.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The use of lithium disilicate dental ceramics is increasing in dentistry and previous reports have suggested that they may have greater biological risks than previously thought. We tested a hypothesis that composition and processing influence the biological properties of these ceramics.
METHODS: The cytotoxicity of two machined and three pressed lithium disilicate materials (n=6) were tested in vitro using mouse fibroblasts in direct contact with the materials for 72h. Cellular response was estimated by mitochondrial succinate dehydrogenase activity (MTT method). Mitochondrial activity was expressed as a percentage of Teflon controls, then compared to Teflon using 2-sided t-tests (alpha=0.05). Polished materials were aged in artificial saliva and tested for cytotoxicity periodically over 6 weeks, then were repolished (320grit SiC paper), aged and tested again for 4 weeks.
RESULTS: All materials significantly (50-70%) suppressed cellular mitochondrial activity in the initial week, but suppression decreased by 25-30% over the next 2 weeks. In weeks 4 and 6 some materials exhibited a cytotoxic 'relapse' of 10-20%. The cytotoxic response was no different for machined or pressed materials, but the presence of ZnO had at least an association with longer-term cytotoxicity and relapse. Repolishing to 320grit did not increase cytotoxicity significantly. SIGNIFICANCE: Our results suggest that lithium disilicates are not biologically inert, and that many have a similar cytotoxicity dynamic regardless of small differences in composition or processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17675143     DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2007.06.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Mater        ISSN: 0109-5641            Impact factor:   5.304


  5 in total

1.  Letters to the editor.

Authors:  Kelvin I Afrashtehfar; Urs Brägger; Alejandro Treviño-Santos; Raphael Freitas de Souza
Journal:  Evid Based Dent       Date:  2017-03

2.  A new method using insert-based systems (IBS) to improve cell behavior study on flexible and rigid biomaterials.

Authors:  Charlotte Grenade; Nicolas Moniotte; Eric Rompen; Alain Vanheusden; Amélie Mainjot; Marie-Claire De Pauw-Gillet
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 2.058

3.  Biocompatibility study of lithium disilicate and zirconium oxide ceramics for esthetic dental abutments.

Authors:  Céline Brunot-Gohin; Jean-Luc Duval; Sandra Verbeke; Kayla Belanger; Isabelle Pezron; Gérard Kugel; Dominique Laurent-Maquin; Sophie Gangloff; Christophe Egles
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 2.614

4.  Biocompatibility of Polymer and Ceramic CAD/CAM Materials with Human Gingival Fibroblasts (HGFs).

Authors:  María Rizo-Gorrita; Cristina Herráez-Galindo; Daniel Torres-Lagares; María-Ángeles Serrera-Figallo; José-Luis Gutiérre-Pérez
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 4.329

Review 5.  Ceramic Materials and Technologies Applied to Digital Works in Implant-Supported Restorative Dentistry.

Authors:  Se-Wook Pyo; Dae-Joon Kim; Jung-Suk Han; In-Sung Luke Yeo
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 3.623

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.