BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that the incidence of atrial fibrillation after atrial flutter ablation is approximately 20% among patients presenting with typical atrial flutter and no history of fibrillation. However, studies involving this population have been small, with follow-up typically less than 2 years. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to provide a more accurate perspective on the long-term risk of atrial fibrillation in patients presenting with isolated typical flutter. METHODS: Clinical records of consecutive patients who had flutter ablations at Presbyterian Medical Center between 1999 and 2004 were assessed (n = 254). Patients with no apparent history of atrial fibrillation before their flutter ablation were identified. Retrospective follow-up data on these patients were obtained by review of medical records from our institution, from patients' cardiologists and primary care physicians, and by direct patient questionnaires. Postablation atrial fibrillation and other arrhythmias were identified by electrocardiography, Holter monitoring, and subsequent clinical records. RESULTS: Postablation atrial fibrillation was identified in 40 (50%) of 80 patients, and an additional three patients presented with atypical atrial flutter, after a mean follow-up of 29.6 +/- 21.7 months. The incidence of atrial fibrillation was progressive, with 49% occurring after 2 years. There was no difference in age, left atrial size, hypertension, structural heart disease, or left ventricular dysfunction in patients who developed atrial fibrillation compared with those who did not. CONCLUSION: Atrial fibrillation occurs in over half of patients who present with isolated typical flutter after cavotricuspid isthmus ablation. Asymptomatic patients should be screened for recurrent arrhythmias indefinitely after ablation. In certain patients, atrial fibrillation and flutter may be different expressions of the same electrical disease, and eradication of the flutter circuit will not prevent the eventual manifestation of atrial fibrillation.
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that the incidence of atrial fibrillation after atrial flutter ablation is approximately 20% among patients presenting with typical atrial flutter and no history of fibrillation. However, studies involving this population have been small, with follow-up typically less than 2 years. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to provide a more accurate perspective on the long-term risk of atrial fibrillation in patients presenting with isolated typical flutter. METHODS: Clinical records of consecutive patients who had flutter ablations at Presbyterian Medical Center between 1999 and 2004 were assessed (n = 254). Patients with no apparent history of atrial fibrillation before their flutter ablation were identified. Retrospective follow-up data on these patients were obtained by review of medical records from our institution, from patients' cardiologists and primary care physicians, and by direct patient questionnaires. Postablation atrial fibrillation and other arrhythmias were identified by electrocardiography, Holter monitoring, and subsequent clinical records. RESULTS: Postablation atrial fibrillation was identified in 40 (50%) of 80 patients, and an additional three patients presented with atypical atrial flutter, after a mean follow-up of 29.6 +/- 21.7 months. The incidence of atrial fibrillation was progressive, with 49% occurring after 2 years. There was no difference in age, left atrial size, hypertension, structural heart disease, or left ventricular dysfunction in patients who developed atrial fibrillation compared with those who did not. CONCLUSION:Atrial fibrillation occurs in over half of patients who present with isolated typical flutter after cavotricuspid isthmus ablation. Asymptomatic patients should be screened for recurrent arrhythmias indefinitely after ablation. In certain patients, atrial fibrillation and flutter may be different expressions of the same electrical disease, and eradication of the flutter circuit will not prevent the eventual manifestation of atrial fibrillation.
Authors: Jorge Romero; Juan Carlos Diaz; Luigi Di Biase; Saurabh Kumar; David Briceno; Usha B Tedrow; Carolina R Valencia; Samuel H Baldinger; Bruce Koplan; Laurence M Epstein; Roy John; Gregory F Michaud; William G Stevenson Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2017-01-09 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Nicholas Anastasio; David S Frankel; Marc W Deyell; Erica Zado; Edward P Gerstenfeld; Sanjay Dixit; Joshua Cooper; David Lin; Francis E Marchlinski; David J Callans Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2012-05-04 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Jason D Roberts; Jonathan C Hsu; Bradley E Aouizerat; Clive R Pullinger; Mary J Malloy; John P Kane; Jeffrey E Olgin; Gregory M Marcus Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2013-12-13