BACKGROUND: Ventilatory efficiency, commonly assessed by the minute ventilation (VE)-carbon dioxide production (VCO2) slope, has proven to be a strong prognostic marker in the heart failure (HF) population. Recently, the oxygen uptake efficiency slope (OUES) has demonstrated prognostic value, but additional comparisons to established cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) variables are required. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 341 subjects were diagnosed with HF participated in this analysis. The VE/VCO2 slope and the OUES were calculated using 50% (VE/VCO2 slope(50) or OUES(50)) and 100% (VE/VCO2 slope(100) or OUES(100)) of the exercise data. Peak oxygen consumption (VO2) was also determined. There were 47 major cardiac-related events during the 3-year tracking period. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis demonstrated the classification schemes for both VE/VCO2 slope and OUES calculations as well as peak VO2 were statistically significant (all areas under the ROC curve: > or = 0.74, P < .001). Area under the ROC curve for the VE/VCO2 slope(100) was, however, significantly greater than OUES(50), OUES(100), and peak VO2 (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Although the OUES was a significant predictor of mortality, the VE/VCO2 slope maintained optimal prognostic value. An elevated VE/VCO2 slope may be the single best indicator of increased risk for adverse events.
BACKGROUND: Ventilatory efficiency, commonly assessed by the minute ventilation (VE)-carbon dioxide production (VCO2) slope, has proven to be a strong prognostic marker in the heart failure (HF) population. Recently, the oxygen uptake efficiency slope (OUES) has demonstrated prognostic value, but additional comparisons to established cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) variables are required. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 341 subjects were diagnosed with HF participated in this analysis. The VE/VCO2 slope and the OUES were calculated using 50% (VE/VCO2 slope(50) or OUES(50)) and 100% (VE/VCO2 slope(100) or OUES(100)) of the exercise data. Peak oxygen consumption (VO2) was also determined. There were 47 major cardiac-related events during the 3-year tracking period. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis demonstrated the classification schemes for both VE/VCO2 slope and OUES calculations as well as peak VO2 were statistically significant (all areas under the ROC curve: > or = 0.74, P < .001). Area under the ROC curve for the VE/VCO2 slope(100) was, however, significantly greater than OUES(50), OUES(100), and peak VO2 (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Although the OUES was a significant predictor of mortality, the VE/VCO2 slope maintained optimal prognostic value. An elevated VE/VCO2 slope may be the single best indicator of increased risk for adverse events.
Authors: Carlos E Negrao; Holly R Middlekauff; Igor L Gomes-Santos; Ligia M Antunes-Correa Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2015-02-13 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Ricardo B Oliveira; Jonathan Myers; Claudio Gil S Araújo; Ross Arena; Sandra Mandic; Daniel Bensimhon; Joshua Abella; Paul Chase; Marco Guazzi; Peter Brubaker; Brian Moore; Dalane Kitzman; Mary Ann Peberdy Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2009-06-18 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Stewart H Lecker; Alexandra Zavin; Peirang Cao; Ross Arena; Kelly Allsup; Karla M Daniels; Jacob Joseph; P Christian Schulze; Daniel E Forman Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2012-09-20 Impact factor: 8.790
Authors: Jonathan Myers; Ross Arena; Ricardo B Oliveira; Daniel Bensimhon; Leon Hsu; Paul Chase; Marco Guazzi; Peter Brubaker; Brian Moore; Dalane Kitzman; Mary Ann Peberdy Journal: J Card Fail Date: 2009-07-03 Impact factor: 5.712